2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102599
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential of machine learning for prediction of traffic related air pollution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two machine learning models (nonlinear models) and a conventional land-use regression model (a linear model) have been adopted to predict traffic air pollution, and the normalized root-mean-square error (NRMSE) has been introduced to evaluate the models. The result showed that the values of the NRMSE for the linear model were higher, which means that the predictions were less precise [50].…”
Section: Nonlinear Relationship Of Travel and The Built Environmentmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Two machine learning models (nonlinear models) and a conventional land-use regression model (a linear model) have been adopted to predict traffic air pollution, and the normalized root-mean-square error (NRMSE) has been introduced to evaluate the models. The result showed that the values of the NRMSE for the linear model were higher, which means that the predictions were less precise [50].…”
Section: Nonlinear Relationship Of Travel and The Built Environmentmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…5 Although we analyzed the feature importance for different urban form factors, the marginal effects and the monotonicity of these factors on the prediction results remain unclear. Therefore, it will be helpful to add partial dependence plots 69 and SHAP value 70 distribution of urban form factors to further explore them in future studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future pilots may deploy mobile sensors within multiple cities combined with satellite-derived AOD (Aerosol Optical Depth) to further explore the spatiotemporal heterogeneity of urban air pollutants. Although we analyzed the feature importance for different urban form factors, the marginal effects and the monotonicity of these factors on the prediction results remain unclear. Therefore, it will be helpful to add partial dependence plots and SHAP value distribution of urban form factors to further explore them in future studies. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As computer vision techniques and data-driven methods have evolved rapidly in recent years, several studies have employed convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to investigate spatial variations in UFPs using unconventional data sources, such as high-resolution satellite images and street-level images (e.g., Google Street View panorama images), which can provide useful information when detailed land-use data are unavailable. These studies have shown that using features extracted from images in prediction models could effectively alleviate the challenge of estimating ambient air pollution in data-sparse environments and could be extended to global cities. , These studies employed images that are generally updated infrequently, which could hinder the discovery of the associations between short-term high air pollution exposures and the local urban context.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%