2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2014.09.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential of organic Rankine cycle using zeotropic mixtures as working fluids for waste heat recovery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
30
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pure working fluids on the other hand will produce slightly less power but with the advantage of smaller sized process units and at considerably lower costs. Previous research efforts into the deployment of working-fluid mixtures (multi-component working fluids) in ORC systems [2][3][4][5][7][8][9][11][12][13]15,18,34,43] have generally considered the thermodynamic benefits of such mixtures in comparison with pure (single component) working fluids, and as exemplified earlier with the results in Section 3.1, the mixtures do give better performance (in terms of net power output and/or thermal/exergy efficiencies) than the pure fluids. These mixtures have, however, been shown to suffer a deterioration in their heat transfer performance especially during the phase-change processes.…”
Section: Multi-objective Cost-power Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The pure working fluids on the other hand will produce slightly less power but with the advantage of smaller sized process units and at considerably lower costs. Previous research efforts into the deployment of working-fluid mixtures (multi-component working fluids) in ORC systems [2][3][4][5][7][8][9][11][12][13]15,18,34,43] have generally considered the thermodynamic benefits of such mixtures in comparison with pure (single component) working fluids, and as exemplified earlier with the results in Section 3.1, the mixtures do give better performance (in terms of net power output and/or thermal/exergy efficiencies) than the pure fluids. These mixtures have, however, been shown to suffer a deterioration in their heat transfer performance especially during the phase-change processes.…”
Section: Multi-objective Cost-power Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In fact, the temperature glide is a reasonably good predictor of the maximum power-output in our study, since high power-output mixtures have relatively high temperature glides, which are also closer to the external heat sink temperature changes (10 • C). Although this holds true for closely related binary mixtures, it has been suggested that mixtures of highly dissimilar fluids may not follow this trend [5,18,34].…”
Section: Optimal Cycles With Working-fluid Mixturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LEC is usually selected as evaluation criterion to optimize the system economic performance. Its calculation ignores the field capital cost and the field O&M cost for simplification, and it can be expressed as [51,52]:…”
Section: (40)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the ORC waste heat recovery systems, the match of working fluids with systems and heat source heavily affects the system performance [13,14]. Roy and Misra [15] presented an analysis of the regenerative organic Rankine cycle (RORC) based on parametric optimization using R123 and R134a during superheating at a constant pressure of 2.50 MPa under realistic conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%