2023
DOI: 10.1002/mds.29325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential Pitfalls of Remote and Automated Video Assessments of Movements Disorders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The structure of the Decision Tree and the confusion matrix of the classification results are shown in Figure 8 and Figure 9, respectively. entropy = 2.278 samples = 60 value = [7,13,14,15,11] 8)) aligns well with the MDS-UPDRS rating guidelines. These guidelines instruct raters to evaluate finger tapping based on: (i) amplitude, (ii) velocity, (iii) decrement in amplitude or velocity during repetitive tapping, and (iv) the presence of halts or hesitations [3].…”
Section: Classification Of Updrs Finger Tapping Scoresupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The structure of the Decision Tree and the confusion matrix of the classification results are shown in Figure 8 and Figure 9, respectively. entropy = 2.278 samples = 60 value = [7,13,14,15,11] 8)) aligns well with the MDS-UPDRS rating guidelines. These guidelines instruct raters to evaluate finger tapping based on: (i) amplitude, (ii) velocity, (iii) decrement in amplitude or velocity during repetitive tapping, and (iv) the presence of halts or hesitations [3].…”
Section: Classification Of Updrs Finger Tapping Scoresupporting
confidence: 72%
“…However, concerns regarding costs and potential issues with patient compliance regarding wearable sensors have led to growing interest in video-based analysis. This method offers a non-contact, unobtrusive alternative for the automated assessment of motor symptoms in PD [12,13]. That said, there are technical challenges associated with the remote interpretation of video recordings [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the video’s quality may affect an AI model’s performance. [ 43 ] We can categorise the potential factors that impede video quality into three groups: video-related, content-related and network-related factors. Video-related factors encompass not only basic video settings such as temporal and spatial resolutions, but also advanced aspects like lighting conditions in the recording space, motion blurring and focus.…”
Section: Potential Pitfalls Of Video-based Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, it has limitations, including lower accuracy than marker-based systems, difficulty tracking occluded or partially visible body parts, and sensitivity to environmental factors. Nonetheless, ongoing advances in computer vision and machine learning are enhancing the accuracy and robustness of these techniques [ 262 267 ], making them potentially valuable for tremor characterization—for example, Park et al [ 15 ] utilized Mediapipe [ 268 ] to analyze its feasibility in telemedicine for PD. Although the study involved healthy subjects, the findings suggested that movement tracking accuracy was hindered by poor video quality.…”
Section: Technologies For Tremor Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Types of tremor assessment technologies include activity level tasks and tools such as tablets and smartphones for drawing, physiological technologies such as surface electromyography (EMG) and electroencephalogram (EEG), and body function level movement-based technologies such as inertial measurement units (IMUs) and camera systems for measuring upper limb pose and movement. Figures adapted from [ 13 , 14 ] used under CC BY 4.0 and from [ 15 ] used under granted copyright by CCC RightsLink …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%