1987
DOI: 10.1177/105381518701100202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential Predictors of Child Progress as Measured by the Early Intervention Developmental Profile

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to investigate the extent to which various factors (demographics, intervention, and test score derivatives) were associated with observed developmental gains in a sample of 83 developmentally delayed children. The Early Intervention Developmental Profile (Rogers et al.,1981) was used to measure child progress. The differences between the pre- and posttest ratio scores (developmental age divided by chronological age) on each scale were the dependent variables in six regression anal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The finding that the preintervention level of development or degree of delay at pretest emerged as the strongest and most consistent predictor of gains in developmental outcome vari-Preschoolers with less severe disabilities did not make greater gains in inclusion settings, and children with more severe disabilities did not make greater gains in segregated settings. ables is consistent with other studies of early intervention and preschool program outcomes (Berlin, O'Neal, & Brooks-Gunn, 1998;Cole et al, 1991;Mafro et al, 1992;Mills et al, 1998;Schafer, Spalding, & Bell, 1987). As noted previously, pretest scores predicted a substantial and statistically significant proportion of the variance in posttest ability.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The finding that the preintervention level of development or degree of delay at pretest emerged as the strongest and most consistent predictor of gains in developmental outcome vari-Preschoolers with less severe disabilities did not make greater gains in inclusion settings, and children with more severe disabilities did not make greater gains in segregated settings. ables is consistent with other studies of early intervention and preschool program outcomes (Berlin, O'Neal, & Brooks-Gunn, 1998;Cole et al, 1991;Mafro et al, 1992;Mills et al, 1998;Schafer, Spalding, & Bell, 1987). As noted previously, pretest scores predicted a substantial and statistically significant proportion of the variance in posttest ability.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%