“…[3,4] DSC is considered ascreening technique,with limited sensitivity,but the results are accurate and robust enough to determine process temperatures to avoid thermal decomposition (often using T D24 :the temperature at which the time to maximum decomposition rate under adiabatic conditions is 24 h), [5] estimate the severity of an exotherm (often using the adiabatic temperature rise, DT ad ), [5] and even make predictions whether impact sensitivity and explosivity are aconcern by using the Yoshida correlation. [6] Such data, particularly on novel or underexplored compounds and reagents,isinformative to chemists wishing to employ new synthetic methods.T here are other thermal hazard tests available,s uch as accelerating rate calorimetry (ARC), reaction calorimetry,i mpact sensitivity or explosivity tests,b ut none are as ubiquitous or simple to use as the humble DSC.R ecently,t here have been studies seeking to characterise and compare the thermal and process hazards of compound classes,s uch as peptide-coupling reagents, [7] oxidisers, [8] N-heterocyclic iodanes, [9] diazo compounds, [10] and cage alkyl motifs; [11] or processes such as Pdcatalysed cross-coupling, [12,13] TIPS-EBX [14] and NaH with DMF/DMSO/DMAc. [15] In contrast to these in-depth studies,DSC data reported in the mainstream organic chemistry literature generally forms asmall part of amuch broader demonstration of the synthetic utility of areagent or process,perhaps used to make cautious statements about the stability or hazardous nature of ar eagent.…”