2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.06.078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential zones identification for harvesting wind energy resources in desert region of India – A multi criteria evaluation approach using remote sensing and GIS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To inform parameters and criteria selection for each step of the analysis, we conducted a literature review of studies on the mapping of land suitability, yield potential, and/or economic feasibility associated with all development sectors (Online-only Table 1). Because technologies in all development sectors are rapidly changing, we limited our literature search to papers published within the last 10 years focusing mainly on global 1725,27,32,54 and regional 16,55–60 analyses but also using state/local analyses 4451,53,6166 to fully capture the variety and weights of criteria used in all analyses. We relied on the most commonly cited development constraints and criteria that could be mapped from publicly available, open access global data to produce our DPI maps and thus facilitate public distribution of derived datasets.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To inform parameters and criteria selection for each step of the analysis, we conducted a literature review of studies on the mapping of land suitability, yield potential, and/or economic feasibility associated with all development sectors (Online-only Table 1). Because technologies in all development sectors are rapidly changing, we limited our literature search to papers published within the last 10 years focusing mainly on global 1725,27,32,54 and regional 16,55–60 analyses but also using state/local analyses 4451,53,6166 to fully capture the variety and weights of criteria used in all analyses. We relied on the most commonly cited development constraints and criteria that could be mapped from publicly available, open access global data to produce our DPI maps and thus facilitate public distribution of derived datasets.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Validated spatially with existing oil and gas fields.Jangid et al . 44 2016WindLSJodhpur District, Indianot listedaverage wind speed variation over months < 1.6 m/s at 20 m heightnoneforested landsincluding and within 500 m of residential land, > 1 km from a roadnoneLS based on GIS-MCDA using AHP/WLC methodology to locate wind farms. Spatial criteria classified into low, medium, and high.…”
Section: Online-only Tablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem of constructing a decision model for selecting an onshore wind farm location is also dealt with in [30], a hybrid farm in [31,32], and an offshore wind farm in [14]. GIS decision systems were proposed, among other things in [33][34][35][36][37][38]. These systems evaluate the potential of onshore areas with regard to situating wind farms on the areas.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existing legal framework for OWF siting in Greece (SFSPSD-RES) [25] suggests a siting approach using several national-level siting criteria that are adapted to the characteristics of the host regions. The present paper proposes the following alternatives considering both the SFSPSD-RES and the contemporary literature on OWF siting: Although numerous studies in the literature suggest criteria and their minimum allowed limits for OWF development at global level (e.g., [37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46]), in this paper, the literature review is restricted to Greek case studies found in the literature (e.g., [47][48][49][50]). Finally, a few criteria were suggested by the authors and not found either in the SFSPSD-RES or in the literature review (e.g., continuous and discontinuous urban web).…”
Section: Identification Of Alternativesmentioning
confidence: 99%