2006
DOI: 10.1136/jme.2005.014738
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potentiality of embryonic stem cells: an ethical problem even with alternative stem cell sources

Abstract: The recent discussions about alternative sources of human embryonic stem cells (White Paper of the US President’s Council on Bioethics, 2005), while stirring new interest in the developmental potential of the various abnormal embryos or constructs proposed as such sources, also raise questions about the potential of the derived embryonic stem cells. The data on the developmental potential of embryonic stem cells that seem relevant for ethical considerations and aspects of patentability are discussed. Particula… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The open chromatin conformation seen at multiple promoter regions in ES cells also suggests the rationale for open chromatin structure in stem cells. Adults stem cells are also a potentially safer cell source, compared to embryonic stem cells, which are known to form teratomas, a specific type of tumour consisting of derivatives of all three germ layers when implanted into ectopic sites [49,50]. This effect has not been reported following implantation of adult stem (progenitor) cells.…”
Section: Epigenetics and Stem Cell Biologymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The open chromatin conformation seen at multiple promoter regions in ES cells also suggests the rationale for open chromatin structure in stem cells. Adults stem cells are also a potentially safer cell source, compared to embryonic stem cells, which are known to form teratomas, a specific type of tumour consisting of derivatives of all three germ layers when implanted into ectopic sites [49,50]. This effect has not been reported following implantation of adult stem (progenitor) cells.…”
Section: Epigenetics and Stem Cell Biologymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…But as has been pointed out in a penetrating analysis by Hans-Werner Denker, this empirical claim and premise is not necessarily true [Denker, 2004[Denker, , 2006. There are a number of possible ways in which stem cells could be made into embryos and some of them are quite likely to work in humans.…”
Section: More Potential -More Problems?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, potential adverse effects of transplanted stem cells, such as tumor formation, must be avoided. Grafted ESCs may generate teratocarcinomas (Erdo et al, 2003;Asano et al, 2006) and teratomas (Denker, 2006). Although differentiated progeny of ESCs are not tumorigenic, there is an absolute need to assess the tumorigenic potential of a pre-differentiated ESC culture in immune-compromised pre-clinical models before they can be considered as clinically safe .…”
Section: Problems In Transplantationmentioning
confidence: 99%