In August 2018, the WHO published preliminary recommendations that called for a radical change in the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). 1 The newly proposed first-line regimen would be all-oral, consisting of linezolid, bedaquiline, moxifloxacin/levofloxacin, plus clofazimine, and/or cycloserine/terizidone. The second-line injectable agents of kanamycin and capreomycin are no longer recommended because of evidence of limited benefit, and amikacin is not recommended as part of the first-line regimen for treatment of MDR because of its poor safety and tolerability. 1,2 In addition to superior effectiveness, and likely better tolerability, the new all-oral regimen has the important additional advantage of containing two or three drugs to which isolates should be fully susceptible, reducing the risk of starting ineffective treatment while awaiting results of susceptibility testing to second-line drugs (SLD). The many advantages of this new regimen cast uncertainty on the role of the standardized short-course MDR treatment (STR). This regimen, consisting of 4-6 months of kanamycin, high-dose isoniazid, ethambutol, pyrazinamide, moxifloxacin/gatifloxacin, clofazimine, and prothionamide, followed by 5 months of ethambutol, pyrazinamide, moxifloxacin/ gatifloxacin, and clofazimine, has lower rates of loss to follow-up than are reported for the longer injection-based regimens. 3 In this issue of the AJTMH, Walsh et al. report high rates of resistance to several drugs used in the STR based on drug susceptibility testing (DST) of isolates from 239 consecutive MDR-TB patients diagnosed between 2008 and 2015 at the GHESKIO clinic in Haiti. 4 They found resistance in 95% of patients to high-dose isoniazid, 57% to pyrazinamide, 77% to ethambutol, and 16% to ethionamide. Very few isolates were resistant to fluoroquinolones or second-line injectables (3%), and few patients had previous exposure to SLD (0.4%), which are considered contraindications for use of the STR in current WHO recommendations. Hence, only a small fraction of individuals would have been excluded from the STR and so many would have received the STR despite disease with isolates resistant to pyrazinamide and ethambutol. Furthermore, based on drug susceptibility patterns, the authors predicted that only 118 (49.2%) would have received at least four effective drugs in the initial phase of therapy and at least three effective drugs in the continuation phase. The authors conclude that empiric use of the STR in their setting would entail an unacceptably high risk of failure due to high prevalence of resistance to components of the STR.Although excellent results can be achieved with short regimens in patients who are susceptible to all drugs in the regimen, 3,5,6 these studies and recent evidence demonstrate trends for increased risk of treatment failure if resistance is present for drugs that would not exclude a patient from receiving the STR, including pyrazinamide, ethambutol, and ethionamide. 1,7,8 Despite concerns about the reliability of DS...