Quite properly, the medical epidemiologist's main concern is often with the recondite biological and medical details that make each infection unique . . . In the absence of [such] a unified framework each infection tends to develop its own, often arcane, literature." Anderson and May, 1991 climate variability is already complicated, and necessitates collaboration with at least geographers and climatologists. Indeed, an enormous influx of nationally and internationally funded research resources have been targeted toward promoting sophisticated molecular tools such as genomics, proteomics, and nanotechnology (see many chapters in this volume).Clearly, this is of crucial importance in developing diagnostic tests, vaccines, and therapeutic tools, but what is really being studied is the health and diseases of individuals rather than populations and groups. Likewise, the traditional approach in medical epidemiology and parasitology has been to focus research attention on the understanding of local phenomena, considering that the unit of study is the individual, thus pinpointing the critical importance of sociocultural influences on disease patterns.We are not contesting here that socioeconomical parameters are not important in influencing the distribution and prevalence of disease, but we are arguing that some disease patterns can, in some cases, be attributed to the natural environment, as illustrated by the examples that will follow. Finally, there exists an individual-centered approach on the part of medical epidemiologists, which does not consider the effects of large-scale or global environmental influences; these