2018
DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/cky214.265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potentially preventable hospitalizations in Split-Dalmatia County (Croatia) from 2005 to 2014

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ACSC hospitalizations were identified using the list based on the Australian work by Vic DHS and subsequent development by NSW Health [18]. In this research, we used this list because Croatia has not yet established its own ACSC definition and because some previous studies in Croatia have used it [15,24]. According to the mentioned list, ACSC hospitalizations were divided into three categories: vaccine-preventable ACSC hospitalizations, chronic ACSC hospitalizations, and acute ACSC hospitalizations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ACSC hospitalizations were identified using the list based on the Australian work by Vic DHS and subsequent development by NSW Health [18]. In this research, we used this list because Croatia has not yet established its own ACSC definition and because some previous studies in Croatia have used it [15,24]. According to the mentioned list, ACSC hospitalizations were divided into three categories: vaccine-preventable ACSC hospitalizations, chronic ACSC hospitalizations, and acute ACSC hospitalizations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that this study uses routinely collected administrative data that were not primarily created for the purposes of this research, their potential shortcomings should be taken into account when interpreting the results. Additionally, the indicator used has not been confirmed for Croatia, although it has been used by different authors as an indirect measure for assessing different aspects of the health care system, whether in studying access to or the quality of health care [24]. Furthermore, the use of this indicator as an indicator of quality in primary health care requires caution, because the results can be influenced not only by the ability to reduce health problems in primary health care, but also by other variables, such as morbidity, different patterns of use of health resources, and the use of specialist care [44].…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%