2005
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602185
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potentials and pitfalls for nutrition counselling in general practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When examining the barriers that Croatia’s GPs encounter during nutrition counselling, participants most frequently identified the lack of time (81.6%), patient non-compliance (8.4%), a lack of education in the subject matter field (8.1%), and finally, lack of compensation (1.9%). These results are similar to those reported elsewhere in the world, but certain proportion differences exist that are attributed to the previously mentioned patient, and possible barriers encountered during nutrition counselling [ 8 , 10 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 ]. These results differ from the results of an earlier study among Croatia’s GPs where the most significant barrier, which was four times as frequent from the determined proportions in this study, was patient non-compliance [ 19 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…When examining the barriers that Croatia’s GPs encounter during nutrition counselling, participants most frequently identified the lack of time (81.6%), patient non-compliance (8.4%), a lack of education in the subject matter field (8.1%), and finally, lack of compensation (1.9%). These results are similar to those reported elsewhere in the world, but certain proportion differences exist that are attributed to the previously mentioned patient, and possible barriers encountered during nutrition counselling [ 8 , 10 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 ]. These results differ from the results of an earlier study among Croatia’s GPs where the most significant barrier, which was four times as frequent from the determined proportions in this study, was patient non-compliance [ 19 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…At this point it should be underlined the crucial role of dietician, primary care physician and other health professionals (like nurses, psychologists) regarding the implementation of effective strategies for diabetes prevention. The collaboration of all these health care professionals is essential for better preventing diabetes at individual as well as population level [80][81][82][83].…”
Section: Implementation Into Daily Clinical Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The title of the fourth Heelsum workshop (2004) (64,(86)(87)(88)(89)(90)(91)(92)(93)(94)(95)(96) showed that we were aware that empowering and support were needed for both family doctors and patients. The disease-based evidence in primary care, the individual strategy of change, and the population interface of primary care were central themes in this workshop.…”
Section: International Workhops Of the Heelsum Collaboration On Nutrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The doctor has the medical knowledge, patients know their food habits and beliefs. We discussed the role of empowerment in making healthy choices easy choices (87); public health impact of community-based nutrition and lifestyle interventions (88); influencing patients` nutrition patterns through communication (89); potentials and pitfalls for nutrition counselling in general practice (90); the role of social support in lifestyle-focused weight management interventions (91); PCPs`different communication styles (92), and the rarity of reported nutritional deficiency in general practice (97).…”
Section: International Workhops Of the Heelsum Collaboration On Nutrmentioning
confidence: 99%