1991
DOI: 10.1093/brain/114.6.2465
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potentials Evoked in Human and Monkey Cerebral Cortex by Stimulation of the Median Nerve

Abstract: Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) are generated in afferent pathways, subcortical structures and various regions of cerebellar and cerebral cortex by stimulation of somatic receptors or electrical stimulation of peripheral nerves. This review summarizes current knowledge of SEPs generated in cerebral cortex by stimulation of the median nerve, the most common form of stimulation for human research and clinical investigations. Major sources of data for the review are intracranial recordings obtained from pa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

18
307
2
3

Year Published

1995
1995
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 558 publications
(330 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
18
307
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings of significant differences of gamma band activity in the lag time of 2-4 ms coincides directly with the thalamocortical conduction time (Albe-Fessard et al 1986;Allison et al 1991;Pantev et al 1991;Ribary et al 1991). We also demonstrated significant differences for gamma oscillations in the lag time of 15 ms, which refers to perceptual binding occurring in a time segment of &15 ms (Joliot et al 1994;Llinas and Ribary 2001) on the basis of synchronization (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Our findings of significant differences of gamma band activity in the lag time of 2-4 ms coincides directly with the thalamocortical conduction time (Albe-Fessard et al 1986;Allison et al 1991;Pantev et al 1991;Ribary et al 1991). We also demonstrated significant differences for gamma oscillations in the lag time of 15 ms, which refers to perceptual binding occurring in a time segment of &15 ms (Joliot et al 1994;Llinas and Ribary 2001) on the basis of synchronization (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…[5]). Neither have short-latency SEPs been observed from human parietal operculum in scalp or intracranial recordings, although longer-latency potentials attributed to SII are well discernible [3,4]. These findings support serial flow of tactile information in human SI and SII areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…It is not clear why this difference occurs. Any effect on the N20, however, is likely to be small since it is generated in area 3b (Allison et al, 1989;1991) which is some distance from the cortical surface within the central sulcus and therefore less likely to be stimulated directly by low intensity TBS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%