“…It is important to note that the amendment of soil with non-conventional ameliorants which are sustainable and economical, has proved to be very successful due to their ability to perform anticipated outcomes in the geotechnical parameters of soft clay soil compared to conventional ameliorants. Thus, the emerging advances in construction materials have proved that diverse ameliorants rich in alumina and silica such as sawdust ash—quarry dust 5 , cement kiln dust—rice husk ash 6 , cement kiln dust—metakaolin 7 , 8 , cement kiln dust 9 , periwinkle shell ash 10 , oyster shell ash 11 , 12 , quarry dust 13 , marble dust—rice husk ash 14 , coconut husk ash 15 , corncob ash 16 , locust bean waste ash 17 , 18 , groundnut shell ash 19 – 21 , lime-rice husk ash 22 , bambara nut shell ash 23 , yam peel ash 24 , metakaolin 25 , mine tailings 26 , palm bunch ash 27 , cement kiln dust-periwinkle shell ash 28 , 29 , cow bone ash—waste glass powder 30 , sawdust ash—lime 31 , rice husk ash—sisal fibre 32 , coffee husk ash 33 , construction waste 34 , sawdust 35 , nanosilica 36 , electric arc furnace dust 37 , iron ore tailing 38 and so on have been utilised in the amendment studies of deficient soils and concrete structures. Conclusively, as a result of the positive outcomes recorded by the incorporation of solid wastes in soil amelioration studies, a comprehensive review was carried out on the trends in expansive soil stabilization using calcium-based stabilizer materials 39 .…”