2002
DOI: 10.16995/trac2001_13_23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pots for Cash? A Critique of the Role of the ‘Free Market’ in the Late Roman Economy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whilst the notion of synchronous change might superficially fit with traditional formalist views of the Romano-British economy which assume the existence of a 'free-market' economy, this need not be the case. Recent critical studies of ceramic evidence such as Gerrard (2002) have called into question the basis of such interpretations, with greater emphasis being placed on the role of the militaryorientated command economy facilitated by the Roman state (e.g. Allen and Fulford, 1996).…”
Section: Globalization and Roman Imperialismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst the notion of synchronous change might superficially fit with traditional formalist views of the Romano-British economy which assume the existence of a 'free-market' economy, this need not be the case. Recent critical studies of ceramic evidence such as Gerrard (2002) have called into question the basis of such interpretations, with greater emphasis being placed on the role of the militaryorientated command economy facilitated by the Roman state (e.g. Allen and Fulford, 1996).…”
Section: Globalization and Roman Imperialismmentioning
confidence: 99%