2006
DOI: 10.1007/11760191_113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Poultry Skin Tumor Detection in Hyperspectral Images Using Radial Basis Probabilistic Neural Network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It demonstrates that the result of feature fusion outperforms the best individual classification result. To evaluate the performance of skin tumor detection in hyperspectral image, we compared the classification result with those in [3], [4], and [5] in Table 2. It should be noted that PCA method for feature extraction and SVM classifier was implemented in [3], while RBPNN classifier with band ratio feature extraction method was adopted in [4], the more recent paper [5] used classifier combination method for several features extracted by PCA, DWT, and KDA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It demonstrates that the result of feature fusion outperforms the best individual classification result. To evaluate the performance of skin tumor detection in hyperspectral image, we compared the classification result with those in [3], [4], and [5] in Table 2. It should be noted that PCA method for feature extraction and SVM classifier was implemented in [3], while RBPNN classifier with band ratio feature extraction method was adopted in [4], the more recent paper [5] used classifier combination method for several features extracted by PCA, DWT, and KDA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the performance of skin tumor detection in hyperspectral image, we compared the classification result with those in [3], [4], and [5] in Table 2. It should be noted that PCA method for feature extraction and SVM classifier was implemented in [3], while RBPNN classifier with band ratio feature extraction method was adopted in [4], the more recent paper [5] used classifier combination method for several features extracted by PCA, DWT, and KDA. From table 2, it is evident that classifier combination method and feature fusion method is significantly reduce the classification error rather than using good performance classifier with good feature, it is also shows that fusion features extracted from different datasets outperform classifier combination for several features from same datasets.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The established model was able to identify 91% and 86% of normal and tumor tissue, respectively. Similarly, Kim and others () presented a hyperspectral fluorescence imaging system for detecting poultry skin tumors, achieving a classification rate of 98.2% based on neural network using 4 feature images.…”
Section: Evaluation Methodologies and Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can provide a full database with internal and external features of the samples [10] , and different varieties of objectives may have various external and internal characteristics, such as color, texture and nutrition content, directly resulting in the spectral signature differently. The spectral signature from a certain pixel of the image is useful for the discrimination and classification of the objectives [11] . This technique has been applied in variety classification in many previous studies.…”
Section: Introduction mentioning
confidence: 99%