Poverty and Support for Militant Politics: Evidence from Pakistan

Abstract

Policy debates on strategies to end extremist violence frequently cite poverty as a root cause of support for the perpetrating groups. There is little evidence to support this contention, particularly in the Pakistani case. Pakistan's urban poor are more exposed to the negative externalities of militant violence and may in fact be less supportive of the groups. To test these hypotheses we conducted a 6,000‐person, nationally representative survey of Pakistanis that measured affect toward four militant organizations. By applying a novel measurement strategy, we mitigate the item nonresponse and social desirability biases that plagued previous studies due to the sensitive nature of militancy. Contrary to expectations, poor Pakistanis dislike militants more than middle‐class citizens. This dislike is strongest among the urban poor, particularly those in violent districts, suggesting that exposure to terrorist attacks reduces support for militants. Long‐standing arguments tying support for violent organizations to income may require substantial revision.

Rainfall variability and violence in rural Kenya: Investigating the effects of drought and the role of local institutions with survey data

“…A major shift in political violence research in recent years is a focus on gathering large-N structured survey data characterizing those who participate in violence (whether as victims or perpetrators), the motivation being an understanding of the beliefs and attitudes of populations where conflict emanates (e.g. Lyall et al, 2013;Blair et al, 2013;Oyefusi, 2008). There are multiple direct and indirect paths through which violent attitudes can translate into observed violent behavior (see also Linke et al, 2015).…”

Religion, ethnicity, social organizations and terrorists’ behavior – a case of Taliban movement in Pakistan

“…Poverty-terrorism/violence nexus has otherwise become obsolete in the light of numerous groundbreaking studies that challenge such perceptions (e.g. see also Blair, Fair, Malhotra, & Shapiro, 2012). Second, while FATA in Pakistan, which is the primary theater of operation of the Taliban against security forces and a launch pad for the spread of violence in the country, shares all the environmental factors, these seem perfunctory without reference to geopolitical and cultural uniqueness of FATA or similar regions originating from the decolonization project.…”

Who justifies attacks on civilians? Analysis of attitudes toward terrorism based on value surveys

“…Furthermore, country-level, time-varying omitted factors may also influence our results. It may be the case that support for attacks on civilians may be affected by terrorist incidents at the country-year level (see, among others, Blair, Fair, Malhotra, & Shapiro, 2013;Collier & Hoeffler, 2004;Lyall, Blair, & Kosuke, 2013). For instance, wartime victimization may influence attitudes toward terrorism.…”