2005
DOI: 10.1007/s11205-004-1072-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Poverty, Psychological Resources And Subjective Well-Being

Abstract: poor, poverty, quality of life, socioeconomic status, subjective well-being,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
42
0
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
3
42
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…4. Exceptions include Clark (2002) and Lever et al (2005); see Gough and McGregor (2007) for a wider review. In Peru, DFID and World Bank (2003) focused on poor people's perceptions of poverty using focus group discussions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4. Exceptions include Clark (2002) and Lever et al (2005); see Gough and McGregor (2007) for a wider review. In Peru, DFID and World Bank (2003) focused on poor people's perceptions of poverty using focus group discussions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Rosenberg (1989) has shown there to be a relationship between socioeconomic status and self-esteem. Contrary to these findings, some studies have found no relationship between socioeconomic status and scholastic self-perception (Schmitz, 2006) or socioeconomic status and selfesteem (Lever, Pinol, & Uralde, 2005). In addition to socioeconomic status influencing student's selfesteem and perceived academic abilities, a relationship between self-esteem and academic success has developed in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…A systematic review performed by Thoits (1995) on the relative importance of different personal resources for stress management and psychological well-being states that 'an impressive number of studies show that a sense of control or mastery both directly reduces psychological disturbance and physical illness and buffers the deleterious effects of stress exposure on physical and mental health' (p. 60). Hence, one's degree of perceived control is an important shock absorber, moderating the negative impact of stressors on mental well-being, and although most evidence concerns populations in relatively affluent conditions, the same mechanism is borne out among a number of low-income groups, for example among Salvadoran refugees recently settled in Canada (Young, 2001) and poor residents of Mexico City (Lever et al, 2005).…”
Section: Locus Of Control As a Characteristic Of 'Common Economic Lifmentioning
confidence: 99%