2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2011.01.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Powder injection moulding of premixed ferritic and austenitic stainless steel powders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
20
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…CPVC was experimentally determined by means of oil absorption ASTM D-281-31 method using Thermo Haake Rheomix mixer (Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), Selangor, Malaysia) where 0.5 mL volume of oleic acid was added to 200 g of SS316L powder for every 5 min [30]. If the addition of oil continues, the torque value decreases abruptly indicating that the critical powder volume concentration is reached [31]. Equation (1) is employed to obtain the CPVC using powder volume (V p ) and acid oleic volume (V o ) at the point where the torque is a maximum.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CPVC was experimentally determined by means of oil absorption ASTM D-281-31 method using Thermo Haake Rheomix mixer (Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), Selangor, Malaysia) where 0.5 mL volume of oleic acid was added to 200 g of SS316L powder for every 5 min [30]. If the addition of oil continues, the torque value decreases abruptly indicating that the critical powder volume concentration is reached [31]. Equation (1) is employed to obtain the CPVC using powder volume (V p ) and acid oleic volume (V o ) at the point where the torque is a maximum.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be observed that the viscosity of all the feedstock decreases with increasing shear rate which indicates pseudoplastic behavior [1] and leads to good wettability of the binder and metal powder [35]. The shear rate range of 100 s´1 to 10,000 s´1 was selected because it is similar shear rate values obtained during injection stage [31]. For the feedstock to be successfully injected, viscosity values recommended for MIM process must be less than 100 Pa.s for viscosity and 100 s´1 to 10,000 s´1 in shear rate [31,36].…”
Section: Rheological Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Raza et al suggested that for successful metal injection molding the shear rate ranges between 102 and 105 s -1 and the maximum suitable viscosity for feedstock is 103 Pa at the molding temperature [30]. Considering the viscosity values recommended for PIM process, less than 1000 Pa s in the shear rate range between 100 and 1000 s −1 [31]. So as to inject the feedstock into injection molding machine, the viscosity and shear rate should be 1000 Pa.s and in the range of 100 to 10000 s -1 respectively [32].…”
Section: Fluiditymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides that, the removal rate of PS and NaCl was rapidly increased until achieved plateau stage at certain period. Based on the study done by Sotomayor et al (2011), solvent debinding typically consist of two stages; dissolution and diffusion. Higher rate of extraction during initial stage was because the solvent has direct contact with the solute (PS and NaCl) so the distance is shorter.…”
Section: Debindingmentioning
confidence: 99%