2010
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/217/1/012097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Powders with superparamagnetic Fe3C particles studied with Mössbauer spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data from Fe3C collected below 55 K was not included in this work, due to the spectral change seen in the 50 K spectrum of Figure 5. The nature of this spectral change is not currently known, but can be seen in the 2009 work by David et al [12] For comparison of Debye temperatures, it appears that different methods of calculation, and the experimental approach used has profound effects on the outcome, as summarised in Table 8 for Fe3C. As such, the values stated in this work are for consideration of Mössbauer data, and the mathematical approach using the Debye model as detailed. This wide range of existing values may be due to the nature in which the Fe3C is being studied, while that studied in this work is ex situ as nanoparticles.…”
Section: Analysis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Data from Fe3C collected below 55 K was not included in this work, due to the spectral change seen in the 50 K spectrum of Figure 5. The nature of this spectral change is not currently known, but can be seen in the 2009 work by David et al [12] For comparison of Debye temperatures, it appears that different methods of calculation, and the experimental approach used has profound effects on the outcome, as summarised in Table 8 for Fe3C. As such, the values stated in this work are for consideration of Mössbauer data, and the mathematical approach using the Debye model as detailed. This wide range of existing values may be due to the nature in which the Fe3C is being studied, while that studied in this work is ex situ as nanoparticles.…”
Section: Analysis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…As the remaining quantities are related to side phases they should either remain unchanged or contribute to an irreversible process. Component 6b overlays with D1 for FeNC porph and FeNC ppy, due to the superparamagnetic effect of Fe 3 C. [ 65 ] This is important to note, as consequently during the in situ experiment, it is clear that not the overall absorption area assigned to D1 but only a partial fraction is expected to change by electroreduction of FeN 4 moieties.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of FCB3N sample the MS measured at 293 K exhibited very low absorption (the lowest value of relative transmission was 0.994) [8]. This spectrum was fitted with the ferromagnetic Fe 3 C sextet (B HF = 20.5 T, ε Q = 0.01 mm/s, δ = 0.19 mm/s, A = 0.28) [7], a doublet (δ = 0.19 mm/s, ∆E Q = 0.51 mm/s, A = 0.64) and the superparamagnetic Fe 3 O 4 doublet (δ = 0.68 mm/s, ∆E Q = 0.70 mm/s, A = 0.08).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The Mössbauer spectrum (MS) of FCB1 sample measured at 293 K was fitted with three components [8]: a narrow doublet probably of superparamagnetic In the corresponding MS measured at 27 K (Fig. 1) the sextet of ferromagnetic Fe 3 C (B HF = 24.5 T, ε Q = 0.07 mm/s, δ = 0.36 mm/s, A = 0.74) dominated the spectrum [3].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%