2022
DOI: 10.1080/10705511.2022.2122467
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Power Analysis for the Random Intercept Cross-Lagged Panel Model Using thepowRICLPMR-Package

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Ecological momentary assessment studies can clarify such microprocesses. Fourth, the sample size of Sample 2 was relatively small for a RI‐CLPM (Mulder, 2022), and the null‐findings in associations between self‐esteem and LOC eating may be due to a lack of power. However, Sample 1—which is more highly powered—did not provide support for within‐person associations between self‐esteem and LOC while overeating.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ecological momentary assessment studies can clarify such microprocesses. Fourth, the sample size of Sample 2 was relatively small for a RI‐CLPM (Mulder, 2022), and the null‐findings in associations between self‐esteem and LOC eating may be due to a lack of power. However, Sample 1—which is more highly powered—did not provide support for within‐person associations between self‐esteem and LOC while overeating.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ecological momentary assessment studies can clarify such microprocesses. Fourth, the sample size of Sample 2 was relatively small for a RI-CLPM (Mulder, 2022), and the null-findings in associations between self-esteem and LOC eating may be due to a lack of power.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the time of study design, Mulder (2023) had not yet published their power analysis for using a random intercept cross-lagged panel model (RI-CLPM). As a result, we determined our sample size by examining the published sample sizes of other studies utilizing RI-CLPMs (Burns et al, 2020;Defoe et al, 2019;Graupensperger et al, 2020;Micalizzi et al, 2020).…”
Section: Methods Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specific structural relations between the within-persons components were specified to investigate the temporal dynamics between postmigration stressors, emotion dysregulation, and PTSD symptoms; these included estimating autoregressive paths, cross-lagged effects, and the covariance between within-persons’ components (at T1) and residuals of the within-persons components (at the subsequent time points). In line with recent recommendations and prior studies (Mulder, 2022; Mulder & Hamaker, 2021; Orth et al, 2021; Sewall et al, 2022), autoregressive and cross-lagged paths were constrained to equality. This approach was informed by three factors: (a) The time intervals between each measurement occasion were equal (6 months), (b) we did not expect to observe systematic differences between the time points, and (c) constraining pathways is recommended for complex models to increase their stability and interpretability.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%