2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10959-012-0475-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Power and Exponential Moments of the Number of Visits and Related Quantities for Perturbed Random Walks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…provides a uniform approximation for (K * n (t)) t∈[0,1] which is tight enough to derive that (K * n (t)) t∈[0,1] , properly centered and normalized, converges weakly in the Skorohod space if the same is true for 1] . This new observation allows us to replace the existing methods based on Poissonization-de-Poissonization used in earlier works on the Bernoulli sieve and constitutes the first principal contribution of the present paper.…”
Section: Remark 23mentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…provides a uniform approximation for (K * n (t)) t∈[0,1] which is tight enough to derive that (K * n (t)) t∈[0,1] , properly centered and normalized, converges weakly in the Skorohod space if the same is true for 1] . This new observation allows us to replace the existing methods based on Poissonization-de-Poissonization used in earlier works on the Bernoulli sieve and constitutes the first principal contribution of the present paper.…”
Section: Remark 23mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The M 1 -topology is weaker than the J 1 -topology and M 1 -convergence of f n to f is equivalent to the convergence of the closed graph of f n to the closed graph of f . For instance, choosing f n (t) := 1 [1−1/n, 1+1/n) (t) + 2 · 1 [1+1/n, 2] (t) and f (t) := 2 · 1 [1,2] (t), the f n do converge to f in the M 1 -topology, but not in the J 1 -topology on D[0, 2]. Without going into details, we mention that the M 1 -topology is typically used in functional limit theorems in which the limit process has jumps unmatched in the convergent sequence of processes.…”
Section: J 1 -And M 1 -Topology: a Brief Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let us note here in passing that this equality in law does no longer generally hold in Markovian environment. According to Theorem 2.1 in [10], Condition (3) is equivalent to the negative divergence of the PRW W n = log |Π n−1 | + log |B n |, n ≥ 0, which means that W n → −∞ a.s. (see also Section 12). This equivalence in turn is obtained by drawing on a fluctuation-theoretic result, stated as Theorem 3.1 in the next section, due to Spitzer [46] and Erickson [23].…”
Section: Random Difference Equations (Perpetuities) In Markovian Envimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We investigate the two summands in the right-hand side separately. The second summand is a standard renewal shot noise process with response function h. Under condition (2) and assuming that…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…represents the number of busy servers at time u ≥ 0. The process (Y (u)) u≥0 may also be interpreted as the difference between the number of visits to [0, t] of the standard random walk (S k ) k≥0 and the perturbed random walk (S k + η k+1 ) k≥1 , see [2], or as the number of active sources in a communication network, see [17,18]. An introduction to renewal theory for perturbed random walks can be found in [7].…”
Section: The Number Of Busy Servers In a G/g/∞ Queuementioning
confidence: 99%