2004
DOI: 10.1080/0965254042000308039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Power and marketing

Abstract: This paper argues that research on power has suffered from fragmentation and limited convergence, and that the application of power theory in marketing has been limited to a very small number of areas. In order to obviate these limitations, and to revive interest in an area that has the potential to make further important contributions to research on marketing strategy, the paper presents a categorisation of the main schools of thought in power research. These are the bureaucratic, critical contingencies, netw… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The research on marketing and consumers only offers a limited number of systematic discussions of consumer power (Desmond, 2003;Holt, 2002;Merlo et al, 2004). Surprisingly, discussion of the responsible application of this power and the promotion of consumers' social responsibilities remains limited in the extant literature.…”
Section: Discussion and Concluding Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research on marketing and consumers only offers a limited number of systematic discussions of consumer power (Desmond, 2003;Holt, 2002;Merlo et al, 2004). Surprisingly, discussion of the responsible application of this power and the promotion of consumers' social responsibilities remains limited in the extant literature.…”
Section: Discussion and Concluding Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we are concerned with the CMO's power over the broad range of strategic decisions that the TMT makes. Consequently, we adopt a macro or structural perspective of power by focusing on potential influence and preclude a micro or behavioral perspective that would focus on manifest influence (Brass and Burkhardt 1993;Frazier and Rody 1991;Gaski 1984;Merlo, Whitwell, and Lukas 2004;Provan 1980). Potential influence, or power as we define it, is the maximum possible social influence that can be applied, while manifest influence is the actual influence that is applied (French and Raven 1959).…”
Section: Cmo Power In the Tmtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we are concerned with the CMO's power over the broad range of strategic decisions that the TMT makes. Consequently, we adopt a macro or structural perspective of power by focusing on potential influence and preclude a micro or behavioral perspective that would focus on manifest influence (Brass and Burkhardt 1993; Frazier and Rody 1991; Gaski 1984; Merlo, Whitwell, and Lukas 2004; Provan 1980).…”
Section: Theory and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%