1990
DOI: 10.1016/0197-2456(90)90005-m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Power and sample size calculations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
392
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,776 publications
(398 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
392
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Haplotype analysis was performed in HaploView v.4.2 20. For power analysis, the power and sample size software PS v3.021 was used. With our sample size and a minor allele frequency of 0.33 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/SNP/), we are able to detect true odds ratios (OR) for CH below 0.64 or above 1.51, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Haplotype analysis was performed in HaploView v.4.2 20. For power analysis, the power and sample size software PS v3.021 was used. With our sample size and a minor allele frequency of 0.33 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/SNP/), we are able to detect true odds ratios (OR) for CH below 0.64 or above 1.51, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This lack of association is attributable to either a truly weak relationship or the relatively small sample size of our study. Given these data, there should be 80% power to detect associations if the OR was greater than 1.64 or less than 0.46 26 ; therefore, associations would have to be moderately strong to have a reasonable chance of detection in this study. Nevertheless, the estimated effect was in the anticipated direction for most of risk factors that failed to reach significance, with the possible exceptions of sex (with a higher prevalence in women despite higher clinical stroke incidence rates in men 27 ), triglycerides (with a higher prevalence for lower triglyceride levels), and BMI (with lower prevalence for higher BMI).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This change in joint kinematics represents a large effect size (0.7) relative to the variability of these measures established in a previous study 22 23 Therefore, 20 physically active women from a university campus (age 5 21.0 6 1.3 years, height 5 167.9 6 5.9 cm, mass 5 61.8 6 8.4 kg) were recruited for this study. Being physically active was defined as participating in aerobic or athletic activity at least 3 times per week for at least 30 minutes each time.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%