Power aware many to many routing in wireless sensor and actuator networks

Çayırcı, Erdal; Coplu, Tolga; Emiroglu, O.

doi:10.1109/ewsn.2005.1462016

Cited by 20 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…27, It can be observed that the value of PDR increases with the increase number of actors and inversely proportional to the number of sensors. Cayirci et al [82] have proposed a power aware many-tomany routing protocol for WSAN. It has two versions.…”

Section: Geometric Broadcast Routing Protocol (Gbrp)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative Analysis of Routing Protocols in Wireless Sensor–Actor Networks: A Review

Kakarla

Majhi

Battula

2015

Int J Wireless Inf Networks

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Wireless sensor-actor networks (WSANs) are applicable in versatile domains ranging from very common to those which demand reliable actions in the event area. The unique characteristics of WSANs and the resourceconstrained nature of the constituent sensor nodes give rise to design energy and delay efficient routing protocols. Many researchers have made considerable efforts to meet these challenges by designing energy and delay efficient protocols. In this paper, a comprehensive survey is presented on existing routing protocols for WSAN to analyze and list out their merits and demerits. The study broadly segregates the existing routing protocols into two categories i.e., cluster based and non-cluster based protocols. The cluster based protocols structure the physical network into virtual groups, whereas the non-cluster based protocols either use flooding or broadcasting mechanisms for communication. All the routing protocols under consideration have been simulated in a common simulation platform. Their performances are analyzed with respect to average end-to-end delay, packet delivery ratio, and average energy dissipation in the network individually. In addition, the best protocols among both the categories are compared to derive an overall conclusion.

show abstract

Section: Geometric Broadcast Routing Protocol (Gbrp)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative Analysis of Routing Protocols in Wireless Sensor–Actor Networks: A Review

Kakarla

Majhi

Battula

2015

Int J Wireless Inf Networks

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This constructs an anycast tree rooted at each event source and updates the tree dynamically according as the sinks join and leave the network. Cayirci et al [29] offered a power-aware many-to-many routing protocol. Actuators register the data types of interest by broadcasting a task registration message; the sensors then build their routing tables accordingly.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

A delay-aware reliable event reporting framework for wireless sensor–actuator networks

Ngai¹,

Zhou²,

Lyu³

et al. 2010

Ad Hoc Networks

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Due to the sensor features (low-power consumption, low radio range, low memory, low processing capacity, and low cost), selforganizing network is the best suitable network architecture to support applications in such a scenario. Goals like efficient energy management [27], high reliability and availability, communication security, and robustness have become very important issues to be considered.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A new QoS routing algorithm based on self-organizing maps for wireless sensor networks

et al. 2007

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

For the past ten years, many authors have focused their investigations in wireless sensor networks. Different researching issues have been extensively developed: power consumption, MAC protocols, self-organizing network algorithms, data-aggregation schemes, routing protocols, QoS management, etc. Due to the constraints on data processing and power consumption, the use of artificial intelligence has been historically discarded. However, in some special scenarios the features of neural networks are appropriate to develop complex tasks such as path discovery. In this paper, we explore and compare the performance of two very well known routing paradigms, directed diffusion and EnergyAware Routing, with our routing algorithm, named SIR, which has the novelty of being based on the introduction of neural networks in every sensor node. Extensive simulations over our wireless sensor network simulator, OLIMPO, have been carried out to study the efficiency of the introduction of neural networks. A comparison of the results obtained with every routing protocol is analyzed. This paper attempts to encourage the use of artificial intelligence techniques in wireless sensor nodes.

show abstract

Power aware many to many routing in wireless sensor and actuator networks

Cited by 20 publications

References 10 publications

Comparative Analysis of Routing Protocols in Wireless Sensor–Actor Networks: A Review

Comparative Analysis of Routing Protocols in Wireless Sensor–Actor Networks: A Review

A delay-aware reliable event reporting framework for wireless sensor–actuator networks

A new QoS routing algorithm based on self-organizing maps for wireless sensor networks

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About