2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.bej.2004.04.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Power consumption and heat transfer resistance in large rotary shaking vessels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only the CFD value at 240 rpm for P/Vtotal was ∼30% higher than the calculated value. In agreement with the calculated value in the present work, Kato et al reported a measuring value for P/Vtotal of about 3.4 kW/m3 in a 20 L vessel at a shaking frequency of 240 rpm . Further measurements are required to clarify the deviation between the CFD simulation and the model derived value at a shaking frequency of 240 rpm.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Only the CFD value at 240 rpm for P/Vtotal was ∼30% higher than the calculated value. In agreement with the calculated value in the present work, Kato et al reported a measuring value for P/Vtotal of about 3.4 kW/m3 in a 20 L vessel at a shaking frequency of 240 rpm . Further measurements are required to clarify the deviation between the CFD simulation and the model derived value at a shaking frequency of 240 rpm.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…While there is no big difference in the exponent of V L , the difference of the exponent of n=0.55 as reported by Kato et al (2004) and 0.19 as reported by Sumino and Akiyama (1987a) may be explained by the different air flow around the vessel. The vessel size (0.27 m) of Kato et al (2004) is much larger than Sumino and Akiyama (1987a) (0.08 m); therefore, the air flow Reynolds numbers can be calculated roughly to be 3000 and 900, respectively. This means that the air flow was turbulent in the case of Kato et al (2004) whereas it was laminar flow for Sumino and Akiyama (1987a).…”
Section: Heat Transfermentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The vessel size (0.27 m) of Kato et al (2004) is much larger than Sumino and Akiyama (1987a) (0.08 m); therefore, the air flow Reynolds numbers can be calculated roughly to be 3000 and 900, respectively. This means that the air flow was turbulent in the case of Kato et al (2004) whereas it was laminar flow for Sumino and Akiyama (1987a). Generally, the influence of velocity on heat transfer in the turbulent flow is larger than at laminar flow, which may explain the different exponents.…”
Section: Heat Transfermentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Kato et al 107 used a calorimetric method, based on the method developed by Sumino et al, 108 for assessing power consumption in larger shaken flasks (nominal volume up to 20 L). Despite the increase in volume, the order of magnitude of P/V is the same as for smaller scale shaking flasks, up to a nominal volume of 2 L and having different geometries.…”
Section: Shaken Flasksmentioning
confidence: 99%