2009
DOI: 10.1109/jsac.2009.090923
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Power control in cognitive radio networks: how to cross a multi-lane highway

Abstract: We consider power control in cognitive radio networks where secondary users identify and exploit instantaneous and local spectrum opportunities without causing unacceptable interference to primary users. We qualitatively characterize the impact of the transmission power of secondary users on the occurrence of spectrum opportunities and the reliability of opportunity detection. Based on a Poisson model of the primary network, we quantify these impacts by showing that (i) the probability of spectrum opportunity … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(31 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, compared with the centralized networks, the power control mechanism for distributed CWNs will be implemented through a completely distributed manner, which makes the interference coordination among multiple SUs more difficult. Moreover, as the investigation in [45], the transmit power of the SU will also impact the occurrence of the available spectrum opportunity. Specifically, a channel can be viewed as a opportunity to a source-destination pair if and only if the PU receivers cannot be interfered by the source and the transmission sent by the source can be successfully received by the destination.…”
Section: Power Control Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, compared with the centralized networks, the power control mechanism for distributed CWNs will be implemented through a completely distributed manner, which makes the interference coordination among multiple SUs more difficult. Moreover, as the investigation in [45], the transmit power of the SU will also impact the occurrence of the available spectrum opportunity. Specifically, a channel can be viewed as a opportunity to a source-destination pair if and only if the PU receivers cannot be interfered by the source and the transmission sent by the source can be successfully received by the destination.…”
Section: Power Control Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this aim, the amount of power transmitted in these resources must be dynamically controlled by the non-licensed system. This philosophy is generally known in literature as power control (PC) [37].…”
Section: Resource Allocation For Interference Minimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inequality (11) indicates that the duration time slots from the CBS to SU i should be no larger than the delay of RT SUs d RT i . In (12), the packet length l RT i needs to be received by SU i within d RT i time slots, that is, Equation (12) is another form of (11). Equation (13) is the MAC-layer QoS constraint for NRT SUs, where, R j is the average rate of SU j from time Slot 1 to time slot T, and should be no smaller than R NRT j .…”
Section: Qos Constraints For Susmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the PBS broadcasts the interference limits on its occupied subbands and pilot signals for SU-to-PU interference channel estimation. According to the interference limits and geographic location of the CR system, a cognitive base station (CBS) decides available spectrum resources in the CR system and utilizes adaptive power control [12,13] to limit the SU-to-PU interference.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%