Power, knowledge and the transformative potential of marine community science

McAteer, Benedict; Flannery, Wesley

doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2022.106036

Cited by 10 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 91 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Politicization in the field of urban agriculture (Mugumbate et al, 2024) and marine resources management (McAteer & Flannery, 2022) will bring challenges and may not result in actionable knowledge. This statement convinced the findings of the study, as well as the theoretical perspective explained above.…”

Section: Friction Between Executive Vs Legislativementioning

confidence: 99%

From Mobilization to Politicization: Understanding Political Dynamics of Community-Based Urban Food Security Policy in City of Makassar

Sudarmono

2024

JWP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Since decentralization was reinforced in 1999, local politicians have exploited local policies to enhance their popularity and electability. In this study, I describe the implementation of a food security policy to demonstrate how the local arena had undergone massive political dynamics through unintegrated food governance demonstrated by local governments in Makassar City. This article aims to analyze the dynamic of urban food policy implemented by the municipality from 2013 to 2023. A qualitative approach had been employed through a case study of the implementation of food security policy. Data were collected by snowball method to eminent informants. Also, focus group discussions were employed in certain community groups. This study found that food policy in Makassar City during the study period had shown a political mobilization rather than a pure food security policy to help the community. In the policy planning, the failure was found in the limited technical analysis. The people who dwell in this city were not prepared for agricultural activities, including planting, maintaining the plants, and soil treatment. Also, the typical vegetables that were planted were not suitable for the climatic characteristics of this city. This study also found that media framing was massively exploited to escalate the positive framing of the ‘inclusivity’ of the leadership and attract the people to engage beyond food diversification. On the other side, as this policy was funded through a discretionary approach, massive negative sentiment had emerged, particularly from the legislative. They felt like an abandoned partner. Consequently, the government should create an alternative mechanism through shadow bureaucrats, designed by the mayor.

show abstract

Section: Friction Between Executive Vs Legislativementioning

confidence: 99%

From Mobilization to Politicization: Understanding Political Dynamics of Community-Based Urban Food Security Policy in City of Makassar

Sudarmono

2024

JWP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Taking the above into consideration, we find that universities, research organizations, research institutions, etc., all belong to the scientific community. In the process of collaborative innovation of the enterprise/industry-science community, continuous scientific research capacity is created, peer review and academic exchange of scientific results are promoted, and social value for applying scientific research results is created [29].…”

Section: Research On Collaborative Innovation Theory Of Enterprise-sc...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Research on the Mechanism of Collaborative Value Co-Creation of Enterprise–Science Community: A Case Study Based on the Green Brand Maoduoli

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

With the rapid increase of market competition pressure, enterprises’ collaborative innovation plays a more prominent role in competitive advantage. This paper aims to explore how the enterprise–science community can achieve sustainable collaborative value co-creation. Taking the Maoduoli Group as a sample, using the single case study method and grounded theory, a structural model of the enterprise–science community collaborative value co-creation mechanism is constructed. The proposed model is based on the value logic of “advocating value—creating value—delivering value—acquiring value”, which explains how the enterprise–scientific community collaborative value co-creation model is formed, how it is implemented, how it is delivered to customers, and the overall process of jointly harvesting value at last. The findings are as follows: First, government support, market demand, and entrepreneurial spirit are the internal and external factors for the enterprise–science community to develop collaborative value co-creation; secondly, the synergy mechanism of the enterprise–science community is to realize mutual activities such as joint research and development, a joint publication of papers, sharing of research results, joint research and development activities, and joint teaching practice through means of capital investment, concept support, and technical support. Third, the synergy mechanism of the enterprise–science community can realize the value of the economic and scientific research and the ecological and social benefits (narrow sense), and continuously feed back to further promote a deeper level of collaborative value co-creation of the enterprise–science community. This paper introduces the dimension of the scientific community, forms a special construct, and focuses on the collaborative value co-creation model of the enterprise–scientific community, which fills the gap in this research direction, and also provides theoretical support and practical guidance for the collaborative value co-creation model of the enterprise–scientific community.

show abstract

“…Community science 1 is the just and equitable collaboration between scientists, community members, and broader society [Wandersman, 2003;Strand et al, 2003;Wilderman et al, 2004;Tebes, 2005;Pandya, 2014;Carrera et al, 2019;Charles et al, 2020;Rasmus et al, 2019;Dosemagon, 2020;Barry, 2022]. The core principles of community science are cocreation [Kirkby et al, 2018;ICBO Working Group, 2022], mutual benefit and learning [Brown et al, 2012;Kovaka, 2021], and justice and equity [Chinman et al, 2005;Varga et al, 2016;Chicago Beyond, 2018;ICBO Working Group, 2022;McAteer and Flannery, 2022]. Good community science benefits communities by advancing local priorities, building capacity, fostering trust, and repairing harms, including harms caused by science 1 Community refers to any group of people connected to each other by a common bond including interest, identity, geography, etc.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Recommendations for an NSF Convergence Accelerator Track on Community Science A Community Science Report of an NSF-funded Convergence Accelerator Workshop Facilitated by the American Geophysical Union

Pandya¹,

Aurbach²,

Burns³

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Power, knowledge and the transformative potential of marine community science

Cited by 10 publications

References 91 publications

From Mobilization to Politicization: Understanding Political Dynamics of Community-Based Urban Food Security Policy in City of Makassar

From Mobilization to Politicization: Understanding Political Dynamics of Community-Based Urban Food Security Policy in City of Makassar

Research on the Mechanism of Collaborative Value Co-Creation of Enterprise–Science Community: A Case Study Based on the Green Brand Maoduoli

Recommendations for an NSF Convergence Accelerator Track on Community Science A Community Science Report of an NSF-funded Convergence Accelerator Workshop Facilitated by the American Geophysical Union

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About