Proceedings of the 2019 11th International Conference on Machine Learning and Computing 2019
DOI: 10.1145/3318299.3318353
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Power Load Forecasting Using a Refined LSTM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By comparing the proposed model with LSTM model and AM-LSTM model, as well as various combination prediction models proposed in literature [6], literature [8] and literature [9] as well as VMD_AM_LSTM model without parameter optimization, Forecast the future resource load for the next 60 seconds based on the data from the previous 30 minutes [20]. Figure 4 illustrates the experimental outcomes of load prediction for various models, and the statistical results of prediction error indicators for each model can be seen in Table 2 (average values of 30 experiments are taken).…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By comparing the proposed model with LSTM model and AM-LSTM model, as well as various combination prediction models proposed in literature [6], literature [8] and literature [9] as well as VMD_AM_LSTM model without parameter optimization, Forecast the future resource load for the next 60 seconds based on the data from the previous 30 minutes [20]. Figure 4 illustrates the experimental outcomes of load prediction for various models, and the statistical results of prediction error indicators for each model can be seen in Table 2 (average values of 30 experiments are taken).…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results show that the hyperparameter optimization algorithm can boost the forecasting accuracy of the model to a large extent. The forecast outcomes of the Stacked-LSTM model presented in literature [8] and the Refined-LSTM model presented in literature [9] demonstrate that the forecasting accuracy of the Stacked-LSTM and Refined-LSTM is greater than that of the lone LSTM, indicating that the forecasting accuracy of the combined model is higher than that of the single model. Literature [10] assigns weight coefficients to the prediction results of different models such as ARIMA and nonlinear neural network by computing the Mean squared error(MSE) value on the training set, models with low MSE values are assigned larger weight coefficients, and models with high MSE values are assigned smaller weight coefficients or 0.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Figure 4 represents the mathematical structure of the recurrent neural network. Thus, the below mathematical formulas ( 2) and ( 3) allow to calculate ht and yt in a recurrent way [25,26]. ℎ𝑡=𝑔h(𝑊𝑖 * 𝑥𝑡+𝑊𝑅 * ℎ𝑡−1+𝑏ℎ)…”
Section: Classification Partmentioning
confidence: 99%