2022
DOI: 10.3390/mi13030418
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Power Losses Models for Magnetic Cores: A Review

Abstract: In power electronics, magnetic components are fundamental, and, unfortunately, represent one of the greatest challenges for designers because they are some of the components that lead the opposition to miniaturization and the main source of losses (both electrical and thermal). The use of ferromagnetic materials as substitutes for ferrite, in the core of magnetic components, has been proposed as a solution to this problem, and with them, a new perspective and methodology in the calculation of power losses open… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 143 publications
(218 reference statements)
1
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is the basis for models such as the modified Steinmetz equation [40], generalized Steinmetz equation [22], the improved generalized Steinmetz equation (iGSE) [45], and the improved improved generalized Steinmetz equation [30]. Further discussion on this topic is available in [24], [46], [47]. For its simplicity, the iGSE remains the preferred method for core loss calculations.…”
Section: Impact Of Duty Cycle In Triangular Waveformsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the basis for models such as the modified Steinmetz equation [40], generalized Steinmetz equation [22], the improved generalized Steinmetz equation (iGSE) [45], and the improved improved generalized Steinmetz equation [30]. Further discussion on this topic is available in [24], [46], [47]. For its simplicity, the iGSE remains the preferred method for core loss calculations.…”
Section: Impact Of Duty Cycle In Triangular Waveformsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the basis for models such as the modified Steinmetz equation [34], generalized Steinmetz equation [16], the improved generalized Steinmetz equation (iGSE) [40], and the improved improved generalized Steinmetz equation [26]. Further discussion on this topic is available in [18], [41], [42]. For its simplicity, iGSE remains the preferred method for core loss calculations.…”
Section: Impact Of Duty Cycle In Triangular Waveformsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, for high frequency applications, these materials are more preferred than the conventional ferrites, as reducing core losses is very significant at higher frequencies. Also, amorphous materials are more preferred for applications requiring higher saturation flux densities, since they have flux densities of more than 1.5 T, whereas the conventional ferrites have saturation flux density values of about 0.3-0.5 T [4].…”
Section: Pcb Materials Polyamidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Better performance is seen when the transformer operates closer to it its saturation magnetic flux density value of the core [3]. Stray magnetic flux lines developed in the gaps of the transformer core causes fringing losses in the PT [4]. Such undesired gaps in the core are significantly reduced due to the stacked arrangement of windings, PCB layers and insulators in a PT structure [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%