“…Anthropologists have utilized the concept of sovereignty as a discursive analytical tool to study Indigenous cultures and their quest for self‐determination in the United States, Canada, and Africa primarily due to the shared experiences of European colonialism and the political legacies it left on successor states (see Bonilla, 2017; Kauanui, 2017; Sturm, 2017). This has marked a shift from studying the classic forms of political systems and power structures toward new forms of domination (see Clements, 2016; Dobratz et al., 2019; Krzyzaniak, 2010; Nash, 2007; Neuman, 2008; Orum & Dale, 2009; Rush, 1992; Smith, 2011). Following a growing debate on the modern conception of sovereignty and, more importantly, its contemporary rearticulation by Foucault and Agamben, social scientists began to not only retheorize the persisting legacy of settler colonialism (Cavanagh & Veracini, 2017; Martier, 2017) and explore how the colonizers dispossessed the Indigenous people from their lands, perpetrated outright genocides (see Weitz, 2003), and deployed forced assimilation, a practice that Wolfe (2006, 27) referred to as “the logic of elimination,” but also investigate the modern forms of colonialism that render minoritized and vulnerable communities disposable and expendable.…”