2022
DOI: 10.5195/jwsr.2022.1140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Power, Profit, and Prometheanism, Part I

Abstract: No civilization has been more Promethean than capitalism in its aspirations. Named after the Greek Titan who gave fire to humankind, Prometheanism is understood as a kind of environmental-but not (necessarily) environmentalist-strategy for the domination and management of something usually called Nature. Unfortunately, the discussion often stops there. But if Prometheanism is domination, How does it turn a profit? This is an elementary, yet frequently, unasked question of a civilization that dispenses with eve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But the evils attributed to the "Anthropocene" cannot be the responsibility of all humanity; the main culprits, who have the political and economic power to shape the forms of production and consumption and define lifestyles, must be distinguished from the majority of the population, whose power to change things cannot be compared with those. The Anthropocene argument is called "a conceptual and historical mess, a neo-Malthusian view of population, a fanciful historical interpretation" (Moore, J.W., 2022). It is not just about a word, but a misleading way of understanding things, affecting communication, advocacy, public policies, research and teaching programs (Pilon, A. F., 2023).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But the evils attributed to the "Anthropocene" cannot be the responsibility of all humanity; the main culprits, who have the political and economic power to shape the forms of production and consumption and define lifestyles, must be distinguished from the majority of the population, whose power to change things cannot be compared with those. The Anthropocene argument is called "a conceptual and historical mess, a neo-Malthusian view of population, a fanciful historical interpretation" (Moore, J.W., 2022). It is not just about a word, but a misleading way of understanding things, affecting communication, advocacy, public policies, research and teaching programs (Pilon, A. F., 2023).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%