2019
DOI: 10.1049/iet-gtd.2018.5439
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Power quality disturbances classification using rotation forest and multi‐resolution fast S‐transform with data compression in time domain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, we will choose the two most important features according to the importance of the features to build a two-dimensional feature space. By visualizing decision boundaries, we can intuitively see the distribution of different patterns in the feature space and the classification effect of different classifiers such as SVM [29], GBDT [30], RF [31] and Adaboost [32].…”
Section: The Classifier Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we will choose the two most important features according to the importance of the features to build a two-dimensional feature space. By visualizing decision boundaries, we can intuitively see the distribution of different patterns in the feature space and the classification effect of different classifiers such as SVM [29], GBDT [30], RF [31] and Adaboost [32].…”
Section: The Classifier Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…meters, and the scale of the aggregated load is generally small. For residential distribution networks, the difference in residents' electricity consumption behavior will increase the fluctuation and complexity of the aggregated load, which will have a negative impact on power quality [7]. What's more, it will also make the aggregate residential load forecasting more difficult [8], [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Common methods include S-Transform (ST) [ 8 ], Wavelet Transform (WT) [ 9 ], Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD) [ 10 ], Local Mean Decomposition (LMD) [ 11 ], and Variable Mode Decomposition (VMD) [ 12 ]. ST provides a large number of time–frequency features, but it has a large amount of computation and is easily affected by parameters such as the window width factor [ 13 ]. WT has a good ability of local feature expression, but it is difficult to select wavelet bases in practical application [ 14 , 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%