2012
DOI: 10.1080/09720510.2012.10701623
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Power study of anova versus Kruskal-Wallis test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
98
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 171 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
98
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Mean, median, and quartile of total household income and all non‐housing wealth were estimated for all age cohorts and compared over time. Chi‐Square test, ANOVA test, and Kruskal–Wallis test were used to evaluate whether differences among age cohorts were statistically significant at the a = 0.05 level [Van Hecke, ]. Four multivariable linear‐regression models were used to assess cohort differences in P62 and P65 separately while adjusting for covariates.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mean, median, and quartile of total household income and all non‐housing wealth were estimated for all age cohorts and compared over time. Chi‐Square test, ANOVA test, and Kruskal–Wallis test were used to evaluate whether differences among age cohorts were statistically significant at the a = 0.05 level [Van Hecke, ]. Four multivariable linear‐regression models were used to assess cohort differences in P62 and P65 separately while adjusting for covariates.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Group results during gestation and lactation, as well as mass, somatic growth and ventilation of the offspring (during lactation) were compared using the unpaired Student t ‐test or the Mann ‐ Whitney test (according to the normality presented by the data). For comparisons of the biochemical and ventilation data (after weaning) and organs weight, One‐Way ANOVA was used, this was followed, when necessary, by the Bonferroni posttest or the Kruskal‐Wallis test , and this was followed, when necessary, by Dunn's posttest (according to the normality presented by the data). Data were analyzed by the statistical program GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software Corporation, version 5.0, 2007) and R (version 3.3.2, using base and PMCMR packages) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In situations where the data set is too small consisting of nonnumeric data, and the distribution does not appear to be normally distributed, the Kruskal-Wallis test is a suitable alternative to parametric tests. Hecke (2010) showed that the Kruskal-Wallis test represents a nonparametric approach to investigating two or more populations without the assumption about normality. While setting the hypotheses, the null hypotheses should indicate that the samples are obtained from identical populations.…”
Section: Kruskal-wallis Testmentioning
confidence: 99%