2017
DOI: 10.3390/en10122124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Power Swing Generated in Francis Turbines by Part Load and Overload Instabilities

Abstract: Abstract:Hydropower plays a key role in the actual energy market due to its fast response and regulation capacity. In that way, hydraulic turbines are increasingly demanded to work at off-design conditions, where complex flow patterns and cavitation appear, especially in Francis turbines. The draft tube cavitation surge is a hydraulic phenomenon that appears in Francis turbines below and above its Best Efficiency Point (BEP). It is a low frequency phenomenon consisting of a vortex rope in the runner outlet and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
40
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This conclusion supports our previous recommendation about selecting a diaphragm with a shutter area ratio from 40% to 60% [34]. Synchronous (plunging) pressure fluctuations can produce variations in head, discharge, torque, and output power known in the literature as a power swing [13]. Equations (5) and (6) are applied for two unsteady signals acquired on the same level to discriminate between asynchronous and synchronous components, respectively: ST +ST 1 2 P(t)= 2 (5) R(t)=ST -P 1 (6) As expected, the equivalent amplitudes associated with the rotating component (RC) are larger than the plunging component (PC) for the case without the diaphragm (Figure 10).…”
Section: Pressure Pulsations Decompositionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This conclusion supports our previous recommendation about selecting a diaphragm with a shutter area ratio from 40% to 60% [34]. Synchronous (plunging) pressure fluctuations can produce variations in head, discharge, torque, and output power known in the literature as a power swing [13]. Equations (5) and (6) are applied for two unsteady signals acquired on the same level to discriminate between asynchronous and synchronous components, respectively: ST +ST 1 2 P(t)= 2 (5) R(t)=ST -P 1 (6) As expected, the equivalent amplitudes associated with the rotating component (RC) are larger than the plunging component (PC) for the case without the diaphragm (Figure 10).…”
Section: Pressure Pulsations Decompositionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Synchronous (plunging) pressure fluctuations can produce variations in head, discharge, torque, and output power known in the literature as a power swing [13]. Equations (5) and (6) are applied for two unsteady signals acquired on the same level to discriminate between asynchronous and synchronous components, respectively:…”
Section: Pressure Pulsations Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At part load [37][38][39] (and sometimes at full load [40]), a vortex rope can appear. This vortex rope has a frequency below the rotational frequency of the runner and has the ability to excite the whole hydraulic system [37,[40][41][42]. Nevertheless, the ability of this rope to excite a structural resonance of the runner may be limited as its characteristic frequency is much below the first natural frequencies of the runner.…”
Section: Vortex Ropementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the characteristics of the cavitation volume are analyzed at one arbitrary temporary point [31,48,49]. Other cavitation phenomena which are characterized by the variation of the cavitation volume, such as the part load and full load unstable vortex rope, are analyzed at different time points during one cycle [41,[50][51][52]. Therefore, although the stochastic pressure fluctuations induced by these vortices are better captured with unsteady CFD models [28,31], the cavity volume, which will be used to compute the natural frequencies of the runner, is determined by the steady CFD model, which is enough to evaluate the risk of a possible resonance.…”
Section: Simulated Cavities At Deep Part Loadmentioning
confidence: 99%