1980
DOI: 10.1109/tpas.1980.319807
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Power System State Estimation: Detection of Topological Errors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

1992
1992
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Given ΔI 1 ⊥ΔI 4 , according to (5) and 6, ΔV 3 and ΔV 4 are conditionally independent given ΔV 1 , ΔV 2 , and ΔV 5 . In 5…”
Section: P(δvmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given ΔI 1 ⊥ΔI 4 , according to (5) and 6, ΔV 3 and ΔV 4 are conditionally independent given ΔV 1 , ΔV 2 , and ΔV 5 . In 5…”
Section: P(δvmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sparsity structure of J inherently contains the most up-to-date network topology and corresponding parameters. Topology errors have long been cited as a cause of inaccurate state estimation results [2,3]. Moreover, the Jacobian matrix, in practice, may be out-ofdate due to erroneous records, faulty telemetry from remotely monitored circuit breakers, or unexpected operating conditions resulting from unforeseen equipment failure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it is impossible to associate statistically values to those switching components. This is the reason why most of the topology error identification methods attempt to indirectly infer the presence George N. Korres of topology errors from their impact on analog measurements [1][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%