Background: We performed a meta-analysis to investigate the effectiveness of telecardiac rehabilitation compared to centerbased rehabilitation on cardiorespiratory fitness, blood pressure, blood lipids, body composition, and quality of life in patients with coronary heart disease.Methods: We searched the Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online , Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane, Embase, and Scopus databases and retrieved studies published until October 8, 2021. Randomized controlled trials were included to evaluate cardiorespiratory fitness, blood pressure, blood lipids, body composition, and quality of life after telecardiac rehabilitation and center-based rehabilitation in patients with coronary heart disease. The criteria of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions were used to evaluate the methodological quality of the studies. Funnel plot analysis and Egger test were performed to confirm the publication bias.Results: A total of 8 studies, including 750 participants, reported the effectiveness of the telecardiac rehabilitation and centerbased rehabilitation included in the analysis. Except for total cholesterol and mental quality of life (P < .05), all parameters were not significantly different between telecardiac rehabilitation and center-based rehabilitation (P > .05).
Conclusion:Telecardiac rehabilitation was similar to the effects of center-based rehabilitation. The overall prognosis of patients with coronary heart disease can be improved by increasing patients' participation in cardiac rehabilitation through telerehabilitation.