1994
DOI: 10.1007/bf00993218
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Power, war, and melodrama in the discourses of political movements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is critically important for those who have low knowledge selfefficacy and strong state orientation and who may develop a tendency to perform routinized and externally controlled behaviors to obviate heavy demands on their relatively low volitional capacities (Kuhl, 1985). In addition, to save oneself from the risk of making a mistake, one may choose to keep quiet or say what the manager wants to hear in responding to organizational knowledge-sharing policy (Blain, 1994;Deter & Edmondson, 2007;Voelpe & Han, 2005). Yet, these passive enactments can impede the organizational knowledge innovation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This is critically important for those who have low knowledge selfefficacy and strong state orientation and who may develop a tendency to perform routinized and externally controlled behaviors to obviate heavy demands on their relatively low volitional capacities (Kuhl, 1985). In addition, to save oneself from the risk of making a mistake, one may choose to keep quiet or say what the manager wants to hear in responding to organizational knowledge-sharing policy (Blain, 1994;Deter & Edmondson, 2007;Voelpe & Han, 2005). Yet, these passive enactments can impede the organizational knowledge innovation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Subversive storytelling presents itself as a discursive opportunity for political actors to creatively negotiate the meanings of immediate social situations. It is a vital source of collective identity and social solidarity for political actors (Blain, 1994), especially when it validates the biography and resonates with the cultural heritage of story-users. The employment of subversive storytelling establishes moral, social, and symbolic boundaries between political actors, their allies, and their opponents (Stewart et al, 2002); attributes blame and praise to actors and actions in a political field (Whooley, 2006); "affirm[s] the virtues .…”
Section: On Story Storytelling and Political Agencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tactical use of this device is a key feature of modern politics. The Nazi use of propaganda and its campaign against the Jews constitute a cultural paradigm of this political practice (Blain , , 1995; Burke 1941, 191–220; Duncan , 238–52; Edelman , 155–171; Ivie , ; Ivie and Giner ; Wagner‐Pacifici ). Blain () concluded that these struggles against terrorists (i.e., Indian Wars, WW II/Nazis, Cold War/Communists) have played a constitutive role in American nationalism and US lead Empire (also Rogin ; Slotkin , ).…”
Section: Power/political Victimage Ritual/knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%