Powered by Quartiersmanagement: Füreinander Leben im „Problemkiez“1

Lanz, Stephan

doi:10.1007/978-3-531-92875-3_13

Cited by 14 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Beispielhaft dafür steht das Bund-Länder-Programm "Stadtteile mit besonderem Entwicklungsbedarf -Soziale Stadt", das 1999 ins Leben gerufen wurde (ebd.). Mit seiner ressortübergreifenden und quartiersspezifischen governance-Orientierung war das Programm Teil der als neoliberal beschriebenen Transformationen hin zu einer aktivierenden Sozialstaatlichkeit (Lanz, 2009;Mayer, 2003). Zugleich stand diese Regierung , benachteiligter' städtischer Räume in deutlicher Kontinuität zu seit den 1970er Jahren teils restriktiven Bearbeitungsversuchen von Gebieten mit hoher Armuts-und insbesondere "Ausländerkonzentration" (Rinn und Wehrheim, 2018).…”

Section: Konflikte Um Aneignungen Städtischerunclassified

“…Kritische Stadtforschung hat mischungsorientierte Stadtpolitiken bislang zumeist auf programmatischer Ebene analysiert. Dabei wurden klassenpolitisch selektive, mittelschichtszentrierte und rassistische Dimensionen herausgearbeitet (etwa Lanz, 2009;Ronneberger und Tsianos, 2009). Zuletzt wurde aber auch ein stadtpolitischer Paradigmenwechsel hin zu einer Affirmation von Diversität als sozialökonomischer Ressource identifiziert und in den Kontext einer als "postmigrantisch" beschriebenen Stadtgesellschaft gestellt (Rodatz, 2014).…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

“…Diese Befunde stehen insofern im Widerspruch zu einer diskutierten kommunalpolitischen Normalisierung von Migration und "Diversität" (Pütz und Rodatz, 2013). Vielmehr zeigt sich eine Kontinuität segregationskritischer territorialer Ordnungs-und Bevölkerungspolitiken, "differentieller Integrationsdiskurse" und "urbaner Verfallserzählungen" (Lanz, 2009), die zugleich mit alltäglichen rassistischen Artikulationen korrespondieren.…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

See 2 more Smart Citations

Politiken sozialer Mischung und die Produktivität von Rassismus im „gefährlichen Viertel“

Rinn¹,

Wiese²

2020

Geogr. Helv.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. In Germany, strategies of “social mixing” aiming at the development of “disadvantaged” neighborhoods have been widely established in urban politics. Such strategies are oriented towards attracting middle class residents and therefore are discussed as drivers of displacement and exclusion of “the disadvantaged”. In our paper, we analyze such urban transformation processes focusing on the productivity of racial classifications. We present results of a research project in which we examine the appropriation of urban resources (such as housing, neighborhood infrastructures, and public spaces) by residents in such quarters. Using an interactivist approach “from below” and qualitative research methods, our case study on the former “declining”, currently “stagnating” quarter Essen-Altendorf shows the productivity of racial classifications in the residents' negotiations on “rules” in the closer neighborhood or on the use of public spaces. Yet, racializing articulations correspond with the policies of social mixing as well as with the observed selective policing of a “dangerous quarter”.

show abstract

Section: Konflikte Um Aneignungen Städtischerunclassified

Section: Introductionunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Politiken sozialer Mischung und die Produktivität von Rassismus im „gefährlichen Viertel“

Rinn¹,

Wiese²

2020

Geogr. Helv.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…the poor: those who refuse to subject themselves to this type of applied poverty politics (which is reminiscent of classical liberalism) are likely to find themselves branded as 'undeserving poor' and subjected to mandatory disciplinary measures (cf. Lanz, 2008).…”

Section: The Dispositive Of the Social Citymentioning

confidence: 99%

Be Berlin! Governing the City through Freedom

Lanz

2012

Int J Urban Regional Res

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this article, I examine how contemporary Berlin is governed, with a particular focus on the production of urban space. My points of reference are the term 'government' (as employed by Foucault) and the field of governmentality studies (where it is applied empirically). Based on a critical discourse and dispositive analysis of the city's current urban development policy, I propose that urban governance in Berlin may be analysed through the lens of three central dispositives: the dispositive of governing through citizenship; the dispositive of the creative city; and the dispositive of the social city. I discuss the characteristics of these dispositives of urban governance, drawing on a number of examples taken from the discipline of urban space production in order to look specifically at the aims and objectives of governance, its subjects and the ways it manifests itself. In conclusion, I suggest that the new forms of governance based on empowerment and cooperation have by no means replaced disciplinary technologies of governance, but are rather embedded within them.

show abstract

“…At the center of this development lies the FederalStateProgram 'The Socially Integrative City' (Soziale Stadt), an area based policy that Berlin started to implement in 1998, and that has been extended to 34 neighborhoods since then (Krummacher et al, 2003). The Socially Integrative City program relies on the diagnosis of a 'loss of integrative power of the European city' and responds to it by setting up professional agencies at the neighborhood scale, where 'quarter managers' (Quartiersmanager) act as 'mediators' and 'activators' for the local population (see Häußermann and Oswald, 1997;Häußermann et al, 2004) stimulating and funding local projects, partnerships and networks in order to mobilize the area's 'endogenous potentials' and produce social cohesion (DIFU, 2002: 32-33; for a pointed critique see Mayer, 2003 andLanz, 2008).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Between Neoliberal Governance and the Right to the City: Participatory politics in Berlin and Tel Aviv

Kemp

Lebuhn

Rattner

2015

Int J Urban Regional Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Based on a comparison of Berlin and Tel Aviv, this article investigates the ways in which ensembles of participatory instruments mediate between neoliberal urban regimes and political agency shaping differentially the meaning of participation and the types of claims that can be advanced. The article gives an overview of the recent history of both cities through the lens of participatory politics. Two in‐depth case studies further examine the relationship between participatory politics and claim making in each setting: the recent conflict over a social center in the district of Friedrichshain‐Kreuzberg in Berlin and the Levinsky tent city of 2011 in Tel Aviv. In the concluding section, the article suggests that, rather than assuming that participatory tools either co‐opt movements or can be appropriated by them, we need to rethink the relationship between participatory tools, rights and recognition, and ask how participatory structures and political agency constitute each other in interwoven dynamics.

show abstract

Powered by Quartiersmanagement: Füreinander Leben im „Problemkiez“1

Cited by 14 publications

References 6 publications

Politiken sozialer Mischung und die Produktivität von Rassismus im „gefährlichen Viertel“

Politiken sozialer Mischung und die Produktivität von Rassismus im „gefährlichen Viertel“

Be Berlin! Governing the City through Freedom

Between Neoliberal Governance and the Right to the City: Participatory politics in Berlin and Tel Aviv

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About