2002
DOI: 10.1053/otot.2002.30511
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Powered instrumentation in laryngeal surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This decision was prompted by evidence suggesting less thermal damage to adjacent tissue, greater ease of use, less operative time required, and improved patient comfort with the microdebrider. 18 Indeed, the microdebrider proved useful for removing bulky disease. However, it may be that there are continued advantages for using the laser to treat harder to reach areas and sessile lesions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This decision was prompted by evidence suggesting less thermal damage to adjacent tissue, greater ease of use, less operative time required, and improved patient comfort with the microdebrider. 18 Indeed, the microdebrider proved useful for removing bulky disease. However, it may be that there are continued advantages for using the laser to treat harder to reach areas and sessile lesions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%