2009
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.79.033821
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Poynting singularities in optical dynamic systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
78
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Equations (1)- (3) are solved numerically using the finitedifference time-domain (FDTD) approach developed in our previous publication [43] and recently adapted to study lossgain structures [21]. As an initial value of the population difference, we employ the pumping parameter, i.e., w(t = 0) = w eq .…”
Section: Resonant Loss and Gain Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equations (1)- (3) are solved numerically using the finitedifference time-domain (FDTD) approach developed in our previous publication [43] and recently adapted to study lossgain structures [21]. As an initial value of the population difference, we employ the pumping parameter, i.e., w(t = 0) = w eq .…”
Section: Resonant Loss and Gain Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1)-(3) numerically using essentially the same approach as in our previous publications (see [24]). The parameters of the medium and light used for calculations (if not stated otherwise) are listed below.…”
Section: Main Equations and Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also important to note that in (6) the slowly varying envelope approximation (SVEA) is not used. To solve (2)- (6) self-consistently, we apply the numerical approach which is essentially the same as in our previous studies [21]. At the edges of the calculation region, we apply the so-called absorbing boundary conditions using the total field / scattered field (TF/SF) and the perfectly matched layer (PML) methods [28,29].…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%