“…With SCCCR keeping comprehensive and accurate records for surveillance, cancer researchers have identified: risk and prevention factors (Wagner et al, 2011;Tantamango-Bartley et al, 2013;Orlich et al, 2015;Fraser et al, 2020b;Babatunde et al, 2021), the timing of diagnosisto-treatment and access to care (Virgo et al, 2010;Babatunde et al, 2022), and disparities in prevalence among different racial groups (Adams et al, 2006;Meyer et al, 2007;Adams et al, 2009;Babatunde et al, 2021;Thomas et al, 2021;Adams et al, 2022), geographic groups (Adams et al, 2006;Meyer et al, 2007;Georgantopoulos, 2018;Nicoli et al, 2019;Babatunde et al, 2021;Adams et al, 2022;Babatunde et al, 2022) and religious groups (Fraser et al, 2020a). Using the SCCCR, researchers have found trends suggesting efficient and effective treatment (Yen et al, 2006;Overton et al, 2013;Noxon and Bennett, 2015;Xirasagar et al, 2015) and intervention elements needed to address the person and community coping with cancer (Coker et al, 2006). When the SCCCR data gets aggregated into the national and multinational registries, NPCR and NAACCR, respectively, researchers can define the impacts of the more robust surveillance in a richer context (Ferlay et al, 2021;Zahnd et al, 2021).…”