2011
DOI: 10.2478/s11658-011-0008-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PPI_SVM: Prediction of protein-protein interactions using machine learning, domain-domain affinities and frequency tables

Abstract: Protein-protein interactions (PPI) control most of the biological processes in a living cell. In order to fully understand protein functions, a knowledge of protein-protein interactions is necessary. Prediction of PPI is challenging, especially when the three-dimensional structure of interacting partners is not known. Recently, a novel prediction method was proposed by exploiting physical interactions of constituent domains. We propose here a novel knowledge-based prediction method, namely PPI_SVM, which predi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For performance improvements, domain-domain affinity information may be incorporated in prediction of the protein functions. The PPIs may be decomposed into physical interactions between constituent domains of proteins, using the method proposed in one of our earlier works [19]. The use of domain interaction information in the prediction of protein function may be considered as a future extension of this study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For performance improvements, domain-domain affinity information may be incorporated in prediction of the protein functions. The PPIs may be decomposed into physical interactions between constituent domains of proteins, using the method proposed in one of our earlier works [19]. The use of domain interaction information in the prediction of protein function may be considered as a future extension of this study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are used to predict potential interactions between proteins, to validate results of highthroughput interaction screens and to analyze the protein networks inferred from interaction databases. Several statistical and machine learning based methods have been applied for the prediction of PPI including Bayesian Networks (Jansen et al, 2003;Patil & Nakamura, 2005), Simple Naïve Bayesian, Random Forest (Šikic et al 2009;Zubek et al, 2015), Support Vector Machine (Bock & Gough, 2001;Chatterjee et al, 2011;You et al, 2013;You et al, 2014;Zubek et al, 2015), Decision Tree, Logistic Regression, k-Nearest Neighborhood (kNN), Conditional Random Field, Artificial Neural Networks (Fariselli et al, 2002), to name a few. Despite the success of these methods, there is still need for the improvement in terms of prediction accuracy and computational efficiency (Res et al, 2005, Bordner & Abagyan, 2005.…”
Section: Computational Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The computational PPI prediction methods primarily use sequence information [9][10][11][12][13][14], domain-based [5,[15][16][17], protein structure [18][19][20][21], physiochemical properties [22], semantic analysis [23,24] and known interactions between virus and host proteins [25]. Classical machine learning techniques are well-accepted tools for PPI predictions when there are sufficient numbers of known interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%