2009
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1600300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PPPS: Purchasing Power or Producing Power Parities?

Abstract: La version française de cette publication est disponible (n o 11F0027M au catalogue, n o 058). Note of appreciation:Canada owes the success of its statistical system to a long-standing partnership between Statistics Canada, the citizens of Canada, its businesses, governments and other institutions. Accurate and timely statistical information could not be produced without their continued co-operation and goodwill. Standards of service to the publicStatistics Canada is committed to serving its clients in a promp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The relative price index needed for this purpose is a measure of producing power parity; this is not the usual expenditure-based purchasing power parity measure that Statistics Canada produces for cross-country comparisons. The latter are derived from price data on finalexpenditure categories; they generate purchasing power parities, not producing power parities (Baldwin and Macdonald 2009). The estimates of purchasing power parities were designed to give reasonable coverage for expenditures on final goods-not for intermediate commodities or measures of value added (gross output minus materials, services, and energy inputs), where deflators are needed for both gross output and intermediate inputs.…”
Section: Prices Index For Comparing Canadian and Us Outputmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative price index needed for this purpose is a measure of producing power parity; this is not the usual expenditure-based purchasing power parity measure that Statistics Canada produces for cross-country comparisons. The latter are derived from price data on finalexpenditure categories; they generate purchasing power parities, not producing power parities (Baldwin and Macdonald 2009). The estimates of purchasing power parities were designed to give reasonable coverage for expenditures on final goods-not for intermediate commodities or measures of value added (gross output minus materials, services, and energy inputs), where deflators are needed for both gross output and intermediate inputs.…”
Section: Prices Index For Comparing Canadian and Us Outputmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A külkereskedelmi cserearányok változásakor szisztematikus eltérés keletkezik a termelés és a belföldi felhasználás árindexe között. Bár a nemzetközi összehasonlítási programok eredményeinek elemzésekor rendszerint szinonimaként használják azt, hogy a fejlettség a gazdasági jólétet, a termelés reálértékét vagy a termelékenység relatív szintjét fejezi-e ki, tulajdonképpen nem ugyanaz a mutató alkalmas arra, hogy kimutassa a fejlettség különböző aspektusait (Baldwin-Macdonald [2009]). Ahogyan a vásárlóerő-paritás elnevezés is jelzi, az ICP a belföldi végső felhasználási tételek árarányaiból képzett reáláron hasonlítja össze az egy főre jutó GDP szintjét.…”
unclassified