“…In the case of spherical ε-Fe 2 O 3 nanoparticles, their diameter ranges from ∼10 nm to > 200 nm, , whereas nanorods (nanowires) are typically ∼20 nm to 2 μm long and ∼10−50 nm wide (see Figure ). ,, The systems that are comprised of either ε-Fe 2 O 3 nanospheres or ε-Fe 2 O 3 nanorods (nanowires) generally exhibit a size distribution character that is presumably governed by the particular synthesis method and its conditions and/or, in some cases, by the particle size distribution of the precursor (e.g., in methods based on thermal transformations of Fe 2 O 3 polymorphs and Fe 3 O 4 ). The sphere morphologies of ε-Fe 2 O 3 can be obtained via the thermal decompositions of suitable iron-containing precursors , or their oxidation advanced by high-energy deposition techniques, including electric discharge, gamma irradiation, laser-assisted pyrolysis, and sol−gel methods, followed by heat treatments at a certain temperature and for a definite time. ,,, On the other hand, nanorods and nanowires of ε-Fe 2 O 3 can be synthesized employing combination of the reverse-micelle and sol−gel methods (where Fe(NO 3 ) 3 is used as a precursor), microemulsion/sol−gel method (where Fe(NO 3 ) 3 is used as a precursor), ,, and/or by vapor−liquid−solid mechanisms assisted by pulsed laser deposition (where Fe 3 O 4 is used as a precursor). , Preparation techniques based on thermal decompositions and oxidation involve heat treatment of Fe-bearing precursors such as a mixture of Fe 2 O 3 polymorphs, Fe 3 O 4 , basic ferric salts, and other precipitates derived from the ferric iron salts in basic solutions. Concerning high-energy deposition synthetic methods, they promote the oxidation of vaporized iron, iron(II) formate, and an Fe(CO) 5 −N 2 O gas mixture.…”