2020
DOI: 10.5334/aogh.2999
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Practical and Ethical Solutions for Remote Applied Learning Experiences in Global Health

Abstract: Global health trainees rely on immersive experiences to apply their classroom knowledge in real-world settings. However, during the COVID-19 pandemic travel has come to a halt and short-term experiences are no longer available in their current form. As with didactic material, global health programs have an opportunity to innovate the delivery of applied learning, providing trainees with robust, mentored experiences that promote the acquisition of core global health competencies. We provide a series of practica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
35
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The focus areas of GHPs range from electives for healthcare trainees; access to resources; capacity building; technical support; professional mentorship; and collaborative research, public health, or education initiatives [ 1 , 5 7 , 14 19 ]. Many GHPs rely heavily on unidirectional travel, with faculty and trainees from high-income countries (HIC) disproportionately visiting host sites in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) [ 1 , 6 , 7 , 14 16 , 20 24 ]. Although bidirectional exchanges of information, resources, and personnel are considered ideal [ 1 , 2 , 6 , 7 , 14 , 15 , 20 , 22 , 25 ], implementing these and measuring their impact are often prohibitively expensive and complicated [ 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The focus areas of GHPs range from electives for healthcare trainees; access to resources; capacity building; technical support; professional mentorship; and collaborative research, public health, or education initiatives [ 1 , 5 7 , 14 19 ]. Many GHPs rely heavily on unidirectional travel, with faculty and trainees from high-income countries (HIC) disproportionately visiting host sites in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) [ 1 , 6 , 7 , 14 16 , 20 24 ]. Although bidirectional exchanges of information, resources, and personnel are considered ideal [ 1 , 2 , 6 , 7 , 14 , 15 , 20 , 22 , 25 ], implementing these and measuring their impact are often prohibitively expensive and complicated [ 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted in-person GHP activities while consequently worsening the existing inherent inequities in GH, especially in LMIC [ 26 , 27 ]. Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, traditional GHP operations have been affected through unprecedented travel restrictions, limitations of in-person interactions, and new standards for personal protection [ 16 , 26 , 28 30 ]. Challenges to traditional approaches to GHPs, including communication, bidirectional exchange of staff and learners, and in-person site visits, have continued throughout the pandemic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Global health research can offer irreplaceable experiences that will equip students with comprehensive competencies and contextualize the concepts (e.g., social determinants of health, capacity building) they learn about in the classroom ( Jogerst et al, 2015 ; Kalbarczyk et al, 2020 ). Students develop adaptability, problem-solving skills, and cultural competency, humility, and sensitivity, preparing them to work effectively in diverse communities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Training should teach students to be aware of cultural differences, local laws and standards regarding planned activities, the history of the country, local health needs, and general global health inequities that may exist in research settings ( Lasker et al, 2018 ; Kalbarczyk et al, 2020 ). It should also foster research integrity from study ideation to dissemination of findings ( Bukusi et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%