2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.01.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Practical aspects of capacity development in the context of disaster risk reduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Potential actions include reserving transportation capacities for rerouting or to quickly shift to an alternative mode of transportation in case of a rail disruption as well as contracting alternative suppliers to keep production lines running. For policy-makers, the results give implications on where investments to reduce the risk of disasters, e.g., by capacity development (Hagelsteen and Burke, 2016), should be prioritized. Additionally, prioritization strategies in case of a disaster can be tested and potential critical bottlenecks identified.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Potential actions include reserving transportation capacities for rerouting or to quickly shift to an alternative mode of transportation in case of a rail disruption as well as contracting alternative suppliers to keep production lines running. For policy-makers, the results give implications on where investments to reduce the risk of disasters, e.g., by capacity development (Hagelsteen and Burke, 2016), should be prioritized. Additionally, prioritization strategies in case of a disaster can be tested and potential critical bottlenecks identified.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…via climate change, globalisation and population growth. While conducting capacity assessments, it is not only important to map out capacities within the community but to analyse how these identified capacities are influenced by external factors (Hagelsteen and Burke, 2016).…”
Section: Capacitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If mandated by leaders (formal or informal), and found suitable for the whole, it might become a product of learning. This product may lead to changes, for instance changes in cognitions leading to changes in policies and plans, and behavior and/or changes of the collective in an organizational setting (Hagelsteen & Burke, ). The new knowledge may also reinforce already existing understandings, beliefs, norms, and values (Heikkila & Gerlak, ; Størseth & Tinmannsvik, ).…”
Section: Collective Learning Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The new knowledge may also reinforce already existing understandings, beliefs, norms, and values (Heikkila & Gerlak, ; Størseth & Tinmannsvik, ). The processes of learning include time to meet regularly, time to discuss and aggregate information with peers that have similar interest in and understanding of problems, and ultimately their solutions (Gerlak & Heikkila, ; Hagelsteen & Burke, ; Heikkila & Gerlak, ; Maslen, ). This may lead to the sharing of knowledge and information, and actions, first at a local individual and team level and if the organization has systems that facilitate sharing of experiences and knowledge the cognitive understandings and changed behavior may influence the organizations policies, procedures, rules, and action.…”
Section: Collective Learning Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%