Fluvial-aeolian interactions result from both short-term interplay between an ergmargin and adjacent fluvial system, and much longer-term expansion and contraction of the erg in response to climatic, tectonic or eustatic effects.Near Moenkopi, in northeastern Arizona, a zone of intertonguing characterizes the transition between the fluvial Kayenta Formation and the overlying aeolian Navajo Sandstone. Three fluvial to aeolian drying-up cycles form the largest scale interaction and represent the repeated advance of the Navajo erg across the Kayenta alluvial plain, probably in response to an increasingly arid climate. During the aeolian phase of each cycle, small-scale interactions resulted from fore-erg deposition on the alluvial plain, and fluviallyfed interdunal flooding, which both occurred during periods of erg activity.The top of each cycle marked a return to wetter climatic conditions which terminated erg activity, forming a stabilization surface. As a consequence, prograding fluvial systems were able to transgress the denuded surface, covering the area formerly occupied by the erg to form the base of the next drying-up cycle.From a hydrocarbon reservoir viewpoint, the two types of interaction have contrasting geometries. Fluvial deposits of the large-scale cycles have regionally extensive sheet-like geometries and are likely to form widespread barriers to vertical flow. Small-scale interdunal flooding is less significant and forms ribbon-like baffles to flow which extend roughly parallel to the strike of the aeolian cross-strata. The key to differentiating each type of interaction lies in determining whether the fluvial syste coexisted with the active erg, or prograded as a result of erg stabilization.