2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10623-022-01129-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Practical dynamic group signatures without knowledge extractors

Abstract: Dynamic group signature (DGS) allows a user to generate a signature on behalf of a group, while preserving anonymity. Although many existing DGS schemes have been proposed in the random oracle model for achieving efficiency, their security proofs require knowledge extractors that cause loose security reductions. In this paper, we first propose a new practical DGS scheme whose security can be proven without knowledge extractors in the random oracle model. Moreover, our scheme can also be proven in the strong se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison to the definition of existential unforgeability (see Definition A.13), A has access to the random oracle 𝐻 , and the signing oracle is modified to follow the new syntax. The PS scheme in the RO model is existentially unforgeable under the generalized PS assumption proposed in [38,39]. Structure-Preserving Signature (SPS) scheme.…”
Section: Prmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison to the definition of existential unforgeability (see Definition A.13), A has access to the random oracle 𝐻 , and the signing oracle is modified to follow the new syntax. The PS scheme in the RO model is existentially unforgeable under the generalized PS assumption proposed in [38,39]. Structure-Preserving Signature (SPS) scheme.…”
Section: Prmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the introduction of GS [21], a number of GS schemes have been constructed to address various issues such as performance [8], formal security definitions [3], [4], a general framework [13], and revocation for dynamic membership [8], [23], as well as constructions without random oracles [26] and removal of knowledge-extractors [34].…”
Section: B Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(e.g. sequential aggregate signature [32,31], redactable signature [31,34], threshold signature [3], group signature [13,24,25,35,36], threshold group signature [8], multi-signature [8], updatable signature [12]) Moreover, relationships between the PS signature and the structure-preserving signature have been studied.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kim et al [24] proved that the GPS assumption holds in the generic group model. Moreover, Kim, Sanders, Abdalla, and Park [25] analyzed the relationship among the PS assumption, the GPS assumption, and the symmetric discrete logarithm assumption. More precisely, from their result, the following facts are clarified.…”
Section: Bilinear Groupmentioning
confidence: 99%