(1959). This instrument, now known as the Wright peak flow meter, has become popular because of its ease of use, portability, and mechanical reliability. As an expression of ventilatory capacity the peak flow has been challenged because it records flow only over the very short time interval of 10 millisecs. Nevertheless it has been shown to parallel other measurements of ventilatory function and to discriminate between grades of disability and symptoms in several studies (Lockhart, Smith, Mair, and Wilson, 1960;Prime, 1960;Fletcher and Tinker, 1961 ; College of General Practitioners, 1961 ; Read and Selby, 1961).Expiratory flow can be reduced by many different mechanisms, such as narrowing of the bronchial lumen by tumour, mucosal swelling, secretions, smooth-muscle spasm, or inward collapse of the bronchial walls. The bronchial collapse mechanism occurs in emphysema on expiration and is explained by lack of support for the walls and by the fall in intrabronchial pressure normally derived from the elastic recoil of the lungs. Inspiration remains relatively unimpaired, and for this reason a comparison of the expiratory and inspiratory spirograms is useful and has been recommended (Ciba Symposium, 1959; W.H.O., 1961). Using a light spirometer and rapid kymograph McNeill, Malcolm, and Brown (1959) compared the maximum expiratory and inspiratory flow by measuring the time taken to expire and inspire a litre of gas between 200 and 1,200 ml. and converting this to litres per minute. This method has been described by Comroe, Forster, Dubois, Briscoe, and Carlsen (1955), with the claim that it gave values comparable to those obtained by an electrical pneumotachograph. In an attempt to obtain similar information rapidly and easily and without the necessity for spirometer or kymograph, we have adapted the Wright peak flow meter to measure inspiratory flow.Description and Characteristics of the Meter A gasket has been applied around the rim of the exhaust portholes of the meter and a " perspex " back with exit pipe has been screwed on to make an airtight joint (Fig. 1). The back clears the meter by 2 cm. The exit pipe is 4.5 cm. long and has the same diameter as the inlet pipe, so that the plastic mouthpiece can be inserted at either end. The subject applies his mouth to the exit side and expires gently but fully. He then reverses suddenly and inspires at maximum speed. This manceuvre is more difficult to learn than forced expiration, but it can usually be mastered after two or three trials.The addition of the back portion raised the possibility of increased resistance to expiration. To test this, the peak expiratory flow (P.E.F.) of 12 subjects was measured with and without the back portion and there was no significant difference in the results.The meter was also calibrated with the back both on and off against known steady flow rates. These were produced by pumping air into a vessel at constant pressure and allowing it to flow through a calibrated pipe orifice meter. As can be seen (Fig. 2)