2016 IEEE Intl Conference on Computational Science and Engineering (CSE) and IEEE Intl Conference on Embedded and Ubiquitous Co 2016
DOI: 10.1109/cse-euc-dcabes.2016.154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Practical Formal Verification for Model Based Development of Cyber-Physical Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Model checking of specialized cyber-physical energy systems and complex power electronics systems is proposed in [ 61 , 62 ], with the use of a modelling and simulation-based software. A practical verification framework filling the gaps between model-based development and the formal verification process is proposed in [ 63 ], and consists of a model transformation method for the plant models of CPSs, including differential algebraic equations to equivalent models without them, in order to reduce verification complexity. The model simplification method automatically simplifies bond-graph models by replacing complex components with simpler components for further verification of overhead reductions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Model checking of specialized cyber-physical energy systems and complex power electronics systems is proposed in [ 61 , 62 ], with the use of a modelling and simulation-based software. A practical verification framework filling the gaps between model-based development and the formal verification process is proposed in [ 63 ], and consists of a model transformation method for the plant models of CPSs, including differential algebraic equations to equivalent models without them, in order to reduce verification complexity. The model simplification method automatically simplifies bond-graph models by replacing complex components with simpler components for further verification of overhead reductions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In summary, variables are represented as symbols that are modified during program execution, while they are evaluated with assertions. Ishigooka et al [82] proposed a framework with a model generator, which provides models and checks them through symbolic execution. A careful definition regarding properties to be checked is required, by taking into account interaction between actuator and plant.…”
Section: Symbolic Verification Of Cyber‐physical Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Formal methods have been used to verify whether the information model of a smart distributed network possesses expected semantic features [7][8][9]. Using underlying logic and semantics derived from ontology rules and propositions, formal definitions and logical descriptions have been constructed for elements in the information model such as objects, logic, and scenes [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%